November 2008 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-775) tree views should remember open/close toggle

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

tree views should remember open/close toggle -------------------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-775 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-775 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Eclipse IDE Reporter: Mark Proctor Assigned To: Kris Verlaenen Fix For: 3.1-m2 When using the views, such as agenda view, they keep expanding everything, when you have a large number of entries having to repeatedly re-adjust the layout of the tree view is annoying. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-776) Working Memory View by Object Type

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

Working Memory View by Object Type ---------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-776 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-776 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Mark Proctor Assigned To: Kris Verlaenen Fix For: 3.1-m2 It would be nice in the Working Memory view if we could also view by object type. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

2
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-980) Support drl files that contain only one rule

by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)

Support drl files that contain only one rule -------------------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-980 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-980 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Eclipse IDE Reporter: Kris Verlaenen Assigned To: Kris Verlaenen Fix For: FUTURE As possible in the BRMS, a drl file can possibly contain only one rule without rule name, in combination with a .package file. Currently, the drl editor does not support this type of drl file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-804) Provide "Source Path" with includes/excludes pattern capability for JBoss Rules Eclipse IDE (3.1-M1 currently validates _all_ .xls files in project)

by Bree VanOss (JIRA)

Provide "Source Path" with includes/excludes pattern capability for JBoss Rules Eclipse IDE (3.1-M1 currently validates _all_ .xls files in project) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-804 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-804 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Eclipse IDE Affects Versions: 3.1-m1 Environment: WinXP, Sun JRE 1.4.2_12 Reporter: Bree VanOss Assigned To: Mark Proctor Priority: Minor The Eclipse "Drools Builder" is validating every Excel (.xls) in my rules project. Apparently this feature was added to 3.1-M1 by Kris. I really like the idea of validating decision tables in Eclipse, my issue is that we have FIT tests (in Excel) in a separate source folder in our "rules project". These .xls files are falsely being identified as decision tables with a ton of problems. Validation also seems to take much longer than it does with the 3.0.x branch (like from 30 seconds in 3.0 to to 5 minutes in 3.1 !?!?). Though the two issues may be related. A common way of dealing with this problem in Eclipse is to allow for ant-like "source path include/exclude" patterns. i.e. exclude test/**/*.xls For that matter it would be nice to have the same thing for standard DRL files. The validation of a large rule base can take some time and randomly results in exceptions much of the time. Once I've tested and verified a set of rules I could (optionally) exclude them from validation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

5
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-1213) Context assist in .drl when different to then

by ekkehard gentz (JIRA)

Context assist in .drl when different to then --------------------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-1213 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1213 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Eclipse IDE Affects Versions: 4.0.1 Environment: Drools 4.0.1, Eclipse 3.3, OSX 10.4.10 Reporter: ekkehard gentz Assigned To: Mark Proctor Fix For: 4.0.2 context assist in .drl editor has different behaviour in "when" section compared to "then" using drools examples StateExampleUsingSalience.drl when ... State. only shows (), null doing the same in then... State. shows class, this, FINISHED, NOT_RUN because in many cases tests in the LHS are against constants it would be good to show them -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

3
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-1209) Extend RulesView sorting

by ekkehard gentz (JIRA)

Extend RulesView sorting ------------------------ Key: JBRULES-1209 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1209 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Eclipse IDE Affects Versions: 4.0.2 Reporter: ekkehard gentz Assigned To: Mark Proctor Priority: Minor Being able to get an overview of all current ruleflow-groups and the rules they contain would be very helpful. would be nice to extend the RulesView so that it supports sorting not only based on package but for example also on ruleflow-group. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-1404) Introducing "eval(), from, collect, accumulate" support in the Guided Rule Editor

by Massimiliano Magistri (JIRA)

Introducing "eval(), from, collect, accumulate" support in the Guided Rule Editor --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-1404 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1404 Project: JBoss Drools Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Eclipse IDE Affects Versions: 4.0.3 Environment: Eclipse Europa 3.3.1.1 Reporter: Massimiliano Magistri I would like to introduce an "eval()" expression when I use The Guided Rule Editor. I'd like to introduce statements like "from, collect, accumulate" as well. Thank You. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-1770) IndexOutOfBoundsException with subflows while removing listener from RuleFlowEventSupport

by Richard bedard (JIRA)

IndexOutOfBoundsException with subflows while removing listener from RuleFlowEventSupport ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-1770 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1770 Project: JBoss Drools Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Rule Flow Affects Versions: 4.0.7 Environment: MyEclipse Blue, Windows XP, Reporter: Richard bedard Assignee: Mark Proctor I have 9 ruleFlows, A, B and C and 6 others A is the main one that include B as a subflow and 6 others, B include C as a subflow When RuleFlowEventSupport.fireRuleFlowProcessCompleted is called, the listeners list contains 8 elements, 1 per sub ruleflow. The size of the list is set in a variable "i" for performance i guess: for ( int i = 0, size = this.listeners.size(); i < size; i++ ) { But somehow, i didn't check the reason, the method removeEventListener is called and the list size is now 7, so im having an java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException. This appen when the subflow C isn't changing the working memory(no insert, modify or remove), when an object is inserted, there is no error... I've tried with and without shadow fact "setShadowProxy( false/true );" Object removed: listener RuleFlowProcessInstanceImpl (id=7454) id 2 nodeInstances ArrayList<E> (id=7749) process RuleFlowProcessImpl (id=7750) state 2 workingMemory ReteooStatefulSession (id=7444) Stack that show the object removing while iterating on the list: RuleFlowEventSupport.removeEventListener(RuleFlowEventListener) line: 48 <----- A listerner is removed here ReteooStatefulSession(AbstractWorkingMemory).removeEventListener(RuleFlowEventListener) line: 306 RuleFlowProcessInstanceImpl.setState(int) line: 184 EndNodeInstanceImpl.trigger(RuleFlowNodeInstance) line: 30 RuleFlowJoinInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted() line: 89 RuleFlowJoinInstanceImpl.checkActivation() line: 85 RuleFlowJoinInstanceImpl.trigger(RuleFlowNodeInstance) line: 59 SubFlowNodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted() line: 51 RuleFlowProcessInstanceImpl.ruleFlowCompleted(RuleFlowCompletedEvent, WorkingMemory) line: 262 RuleFlowEventSupport.fireRuleFlowProcessCompleted(RuleFlowProcessInstance, InternalWorkingMemory) line: 86 <--- Iterating on the listeners list here RuleFlowProcessInstanceImpl.setState(int) line: 185 EndNodeInstanceImpl.trigger(RuleFlowNodeInstance) line: 30 RuleFlowJoinInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted() line: 89 RuleFlowJoinInstanceImpl.checkActivation() line: 85 RuleFlowJoinInstanceImpl.trigger(RuleFlowNodeInstance) line: 59 RuleFlowGroupImpl(RuleFlowSequenceNodeInstanceImpl).triggerCompleted() line: 38 RuleFlowGroupImpl.setActive(boolean) line: 103 RuleFlowGroupImpl$DeactivateCallback.execute(InternalWorkingMemory) line: 211 ReteooStatefulSession(AbstractWorkingMemory).executeQueuedActions() line: 1312 ReteooStatefulSession(AbstractWorkingMemory).fireAllRules(AgendaFilter, int) line: 467 ReteooStatefulSession(AbstractWorkingMemory).fireAllRules() line: 439 DroolsStdImpl.executeRulesEngine(List<Object>, String) line: 100 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

3
6
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-1791) Parenthesis required for 'exist' rule in Split constraint editor

by Roger Lefebvre (JIRA)

Parenthesis required for 'exist' rule in Split constraint editor ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBRULES-1791 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1791 Project: JBoss Drools Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Rule Flow Affects Versions: 4.0.7 Environment: Fedora 5, tomcat 6, drools 4.0.7 Reporter: Roger Lefebvre Assignee: Mark Proctor Priority: Minor A rule such as: exists Item() throws InvalidRulePackage "Unexpected token exists ..." when doing performing ruleBase.addPackage(builder.getPackage()). Adding parenthesis resolves the problem. e.g. exists (Item()) Similar applies to not and other qualifiers/functions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

4
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-814) Probe dump to show deadlocks and use JDK6 APIs is available

by Galder Zamarreno (JIRA)

Probe dump to show deadlocks and use JDK6 APIs is available ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: JGRP-814 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-814 Project: JGroups Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Galder Zamarreno Assignee: Galder Zamarreno Fix For: 2.7 Probe dump does not currently show locked monitors or synchronisers that can be retrieved using JDK6 API and does not show detected deadlocks either. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 8 months

2
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira November 2008