[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4616) NamingContext lookupLink() does not acquire stub to server Naming service
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
NamingContext lookupLink() does not acquire stub to server Naming service
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-4616
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4616
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Naming
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.2.1.GA, JBossAS-4.2.0.GA, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta2, JBossAS-4.0.5.GA
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assigned To: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta3
org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookupLink(Name) does not invoke the checkRef() method before invoking on the stub to the server-side Naming object. The checkRef() method is what actually contacts the JNDI server to download the stub.. Result of this is an NPE will be thrown if an earlier call hasn't downloaded the stub before lookupLink() is called.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBMETA-79) determineResolvedJndiName for a 2x ejb home returns
by Scott M Stark (JIRA)
determineResolvedJndiName for a 2x ejb home returns
----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBMETA-79
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMETA-79
Project: JBoss Metadata
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Beta30
Reporter: Scott M Stark
Assignee: Scott M Stark
Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
If one calls JBossEnterpriseBeanMetaData.determineResolvedJndiName(String) with an ejb2x remote home iface, for an TestBean ejb in an appclient_dep_compat12_13.ear, the resulting home jndi name is appclient_dep_compat12_13/TestBean rather than the appclient_deploy_compat12_13_TestBean jndiName that has been specified via the xml descriptor/metadata. The logic for remote homes is wrong for ejb2x deployments.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBAS-2870) Separate the HA aspect from the invoker proxy
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-2870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Brian Stansberry updated JBAS-2870:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: Backlog
(was: JBossAS-5.0.0.CR2)
Affects: [Documentation (Ref Guide, User Guide, etc.), Compatibility/Configuration] (was: [Compatibility/Configuration, Documentation (Ref Guide, User Guide, etc.)])
Unscheduling this for AS 5.0.0. It's a major rework of legacy code.
> Separate the HA aspect from the invoker proxy
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-2870
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-2870
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Clustering
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: Backlog
>
> Original Estimate: 2 weeks
> Remaining Estimate: 2 weeks
>
> Comment from Scott Stark (http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3926369#3926369)
> HA proxy invokers like JRMPInvokerProxyHA should not exist. The only difference between an ha proxy and regular proxy would be an interceptor that selected from the available targets and set the invocation proxy such that the common Invoker proxy was told the transport proxy to use. Even an unclustered proxy could have a recover/ha sematic like blocking until the server is availble with this configuration. HA is an aspect that should not be embedded in the transport specific proxy.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCOMMON-60) file URI and URLs not properly handled in property editors
by Adrian Brock (JIRA)
file URI and URLs not properly handled in property editors
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBCOMMON-60
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBCOMMON-60
Project: JBoss Common
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: common-core (2.x)
Affects Versions: 2.2.7.GA
Reporter: Adrian Brock
Assignee: Adrian Brock
Fix For: 2.2.8.GA
If you use property editors to inject file urls they are not properly handled in terms of encoding.
e.g.
file:/some/path%20withspaces
gets translated into
file:/some/path%25%20withspaces
by the Strings.toURI/URL methods
when it is trying to turn them into absolute paths.
The String passed into makeURL/URIFromFileSpec
needs to be decoded before it is turned into a file and later converted back to a URL/URI
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-5791) JBossMQ ReadTask in UIL2 could block until socket timeout
by Takayoshi Kimura (JIRA)
JBossMQ ReadTask in UIL2 could block until socket timeout
---------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-5791
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5791
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: JMS (JBossMQ)
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.2.3.GA
Reporter: Takayoshi Kimura
Assignee: Adrian Brock
This is similar to JBPAPP-685, but in ReadTask. The in.readByte() call in ReadTask won't be interrupted when the thread is interrupted. When this happened the connection.close() call in client won't return until socket timeout, 2 min by default.
Since it's blocking socket, we can't use short timeout approach applied for WriteTask.
The only way to interrupt ReadTask is to call Socket.close() or close() on InputStream underlying socket.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 12 months