[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-9351) Description Providers for OSGi subsystem
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
Description Providers for OSGi subsystem
----------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-9351
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9351
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Kabir Khan
Assignee: Thomas Diesler
Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta4
The OSGi subsystem needs to provide its descriptions, if I do this in the command line tool:
:read-resource-description(recursive=1,operations=1,inherited=0)
osgi currently does not give any meaningful descriptions of either its model or operations:
...
"osgi" => {"operations" => {"add" => undefined}},
...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8671) ClassNotFoundException when a EJB Timer with custom info is deserialized
by Sipatha Shoko (JIRA)
ClassNotFoundException when a EJB Timer with custom info is deserialized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8671
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8671
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: EJB3
Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.1.0.GA
Environment: WinXP 32 bit, Ubuntu 10.04 32 bit, SunOS 5.10 sparc
Reporter: Sipatha Shoko
Assignee: Carlo de Wolf
When an EJB3 Timer is created, you can optionally specify information pertaining to the timer. The information object must be serializable. A TimerVo (packaged in the same jar as the EJB) object thats serializable is used as the information. The EJB is first deployed, the timer is correctly created. However if the server is restarted, a ClassNotFoundException for TimerVo is thrown when the previously saved timer is deserialised.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8923) WAR with bundled Mojarra 2.1.0-b11
by Lukas Fryc (JIRA)
WAR with bundled Mojarra 2.1.0-b11
----------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8923
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8923
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: JSF
Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final
Environment: RichFaces 4.0.0.20110227-CR1 r.21967
Mojarra 2.1.0-FCS
JBoss AS 6.0.0.Final (default profile)
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 1.6.0_20-b20 @ Linux
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/richfaces/modules/tests/metamer/tags/metam...
Reporter: Lukas Fryc
Assignee: Stan Silvert
When new profile Mojarra-2.1 (with 2.1.0-b11 libs) is created and WAR without jsf-libs is deployed, application works fine.
But when JSF is bundled into WAR (and use WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL param) and deployed onto default Mojarra-2.0 profile, it doesn't work with exception bellow.
Shortened stacktrace:
17:42:14,288 ERROR [[/metamer]] Error configuring application listener of class com.sun.faces.application.ServletContextSensitiveSingletonStore: java.lang.InstantiationException: com.sun.faces.application.ServletContextSensitiveSingletonStore
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:357) [:1.6.0_20]
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) [:1.6.0_20]
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.TomcatInjectionContainer.newInstance(TomcatInjectionContainer.java:280) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.TomcatInjectionContainer.newInstance(TomcatInjectionContainer.java:264) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.contextListenerStart(StandardContext.java:3319) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:3828) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.deployers.TomcatDeployment.performDeployInternal(TomcatDeployment.java:294) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.deployers.TomcatDeployment.performDeploy(TomcatDeployment.java:146) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.jboss.web.deployers.AbstractWarDeployment.start(AbstractWarDeployment.java:477) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.jboss.web.deployers.WebModule.startModule(WebModule.java:118) [:6.0.0.Final]
at org.jboss.web.deployers.WebModule.start(WebModule.java:95) [:6.0.0.Final]
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) [:1.6.0_20]
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) [:1.6.0_20]
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [:1.6.0_20]
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) [:1.6.0_20]
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:157) [:6.0.0.GA]
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:96) [:6.0.0.GA]
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88) [:6.0.0.GA]
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:271) [:6.0.0.GA]
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:670) [:6.0.0.GA]
at org.jboss.system.microcontainer.ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceProxy.java:206) [:2.2.0.GA]
...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-1309) Discovery: max_rank doesn't make any sense
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
Discovery: max_rank doesn't make any sense
------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1309
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1309
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 3.0
Discovery.max_rank was originally meant to reduce traffic in the discovery phase: rather than 100 members replying to a discovery request, only the coordinators (max_rank=1) would reply and this would be enough for a joiner to find the coordinator and send it a JOIN request.
However, discovery responses also contain additional information, such as the logical name (if set) and the physical address of a member. This is needed by all members of a cluster, and so everyone should return this information to a new joiner.
Seen under this aspect, max_rank is useless and even conter-productive !
If we have 100 members:
- max_rank=0: we get 100 discovery responses
- max_rank=1 (sets return_entire_cache to true): the coordinator return the entire cache to the joiner (1 unicast / cache entry: 100 unicasts)
- max_rank=2: the coordinator plus the next in line return the entire cache: 200 unicasts
- and so on
The current problem is that ergonomics sets return_entire_cache which - in conjunction with max_rank > 0 - generates even more discovery responses than is max_rank is 0 !
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 3 months