[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-5889) Remote client EJB invocation hangs when a large String is passed as parameter
by Tom Ross (JIRA)
Tom Ross created AS7-5889:
-----------------------------
Summary: Remote client EJB invocation hangs when a large String is passed as parameter
Key: AS7-5889
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-5889
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: EJB
Affects Versions: 7.1.3.Final (EAP)
Environment: EAP 6.01 ER3
Reporter: Tom Ross
Assignee: jaikiran pai
Priority: Critical
When making an EJB invocation with a String parameter of length 600000 the invocation hangs and never returns.
This seem to happen only with 6.01 code line running the test case against 6.1 does not show the problem.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-5794) JMX over remoting pollutes query results with ModelController objects
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-5794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Tristan Tarrant commented on AS7-5794:
--------------------------------------
[~kabirkhan] I haven't tested against 7.2.x yet. I will if I find some time
> JMX over remoting pollutes query results with ModelController objects
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-5794
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-5794
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management, JMX
> Affects Versions: 7.1.2.Final (EAP)
> Reporter: Tristan Tarrant
> Assignee: Kabir Khan
> Fix For: 7.3.0.Alpha1
>
>
> When issuing MBean queries over JMX remoting, the AS is returning a list of org.jboss.as.controller.ModelController objects in addition to those matching the query.
> This is a transcript of a chat we had about it on IRC:
> Oct 15 14:51:46 <ttarrant> darranl, if I issue a jmx query over jmx-remoting I get many more objects than expected
> Oct 15 14:51:55 <ttarrant> darranl, i.e. ones that do not match the query
> Oct 15 14:52:09 <ttarrant> darranl, this is with 7.1.x
> Oct 15 14:52:57 <ttarrant> darranl, this works if I use the standard JMX over RMI
> Oct 15 14:53:08 --> fnasser (~fnasser(a)CPE602ad07ab726-CM602ad07ab723.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) has joined #jboss-as7
> Oct 15 14:53:09 <-- fnasser has quit (Changing host)
> Oct 15 14:53:09 --> fnasser (~fnasser@redhat/jboss/fnasser) has joined #jboss-as7
> Oct 15 14:53:09 --- ChanServ gives voice to fnasser
> Oct 15 14:53:16 <ttarrant> darranl, do you just pass the query the the mbeanserver ?
> Oct 15 14:53:39 <darranl> ttarrant: what kind of objects? within AS7 I think there are two things that could affec
> t this 1 - The Remoting JMX protocol, 2 - The domain management representation over JMX
> Oct 15 14:53:54 <darranl> For #1 yes we just pass it to the MBEanServer and return whatever it returns
> Oct 15 14:54:04 <darranl> if it was a Remoting JMX bug maybe we are messing up the query
> Oct 15 14:54:16 <ttarrant> darranl, the query is as follows: *:type=CacheManager,component=Interpreter,name=*
> Oct 15 14:54:16 <darranl> But not sure if #2 could be the reason more is getting added
> Oct 15 14:54:32 <ttarrant> darranl, wait a sec
> Oct 15 14:54:57 <darranl> ttarrant: I would suggest getting a Jira raised and assigned to me, I can verify if it i
> s a remoting jmx issue or pass over if it is a domain management integration issue
> Oct 15 14:55:20 <darranl> regardless of where it is happenign it sounds like you may have discovered a bug
> Oct 15 14:56:23 <ttarrant> darranl, let me get the objects it's returning
> Oct 15 14:56:39 <darranl> ttarrant: when you enable the RMI approach you bypass both Remoting JMX AND the domain m
> anagement integration
> Oct 15 14:56:42 <darranl> ok
> Oct 15 15:26:08 <ttarrant> darranl, ok, my query actually returns the object I queried for and a bunch of org.jboss.as.controller.ModelController (one for each subsystem)
> Oct 15 15:51:24 <darranl> ttarrant: ok that does then sound like it is the domain management integration that is 'poluting' the query results
> Oct 15 15:51:53 <darranl> ttarrant: going RMI was just bypassing that as well
> Oct 15 15:52:05 <ttarrant> darranl, shall I open a Jira ?
> Oct 15 15:52:34 <ttarrant> darranl, I work around the issue by manually filtering the returned objects based on class name
> Oct 15 15:53:23 <darranl> ttarrant: it would probably be one for kkhan to look into, think he is just back today so may be worth the Jira so he can have a look once he has caught back up ;-)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (JBNAME-61) Remote JNDI lookup failure with sun.io.serialization.extendedDebugInfo
by Dennis Reed (JIRA)
Dennis Reed created JBNAME-61:
---------------------------------
Summary: Remote JNDI lookup failure with sun.io.serialization.extendedDebugInfo
Key: JBNAME-61
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBNAME-61
Project: JBoss Naming
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jnp-client
Affects Versions: 5.0.3.GA
Reporter: Dennis Reed
When the system property sun.io.serialization.extendedDebugInfo is set, a remote lookup fails with the exception:
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
at org.jnp.interfaces.FastNamingProperties.toString(FastNamingProperties.java:175)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1387)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1158)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:330)
at javax.naming.CompoundName.writeObject(CompoundName.java:541)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeWriteObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:945)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1469)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1400)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1158)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:330)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.marshalValue(UnicastRef.java:274)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:133)
at org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub.lookup(Unknown Source)
at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:726)
at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:686)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-5978) DefaultDeploymentOperations should use ModelControllerClient.executeAsync()
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Brian Stansberry created AS7-5978:
-------------------------------------
Summary: DefaultDeploymentOperations should use ModelControllerClient.executeAsync()
Key: AS7-5978
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-5978
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.3.Final (EAP)
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.2.0.Alpha1, 7.1.4.Final (EAP)
DefaultDeploymentOperations isn't using the async ModelControllerClient API; instead it is submitting a synchronous execute request to its own Executor. It should use the ModelControllerClient.executeAsync() API to ensure the intended task cancellation logic is invoked.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8198) DomainController discovery system
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
DomainController discovery system
---------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8198
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8198
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Domain Management
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.0.0.M1
Mechanism(s) by which a ServerManager finds a DomainController so it can begin the process of integrating into the domain.
Task includes the host.xml schema elements to configure this, the domain object model classes behind those elements, and the actual implementation of discovery from both the ServerManager and DomainController sides.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (JBWEB-257) Filter.destroy() exceptions break application undeployment
by Aaron Ogburn (JIRA)
Aaron Ogburn created JBWEB-257:
----------------------------------
Summary: Filter.destroy() exceptions break application undeployment
Key: JBWEB-257
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWEB-257
Project: JBoss Web
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Core
Affects Versions: JBossWeb-2.1.12.GA
Environment: -JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 5.1.2 and earlier
Reporter: Aaron Ogburn
Assignee: Remy Maucherat
JBoss does not handle any exceptions from custom Filter.destroy() implementations. This is passed on to the JBoss container and disrupts the
undeployment so the app is not successfully undeployed.
That causes a potentially critical issue as the application is no longer deployed at that point, but it can't be redeployed due to conflicts with the prior incomplete undeployment. The server has to be restarted to be able to deploy the application again.
The broken undeployment could be fixed at the container level if org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.release() caught exceptions thrown by Filter.destroy()
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 1 month