[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6223) org.jboss.as.protocol.ProtocolChannelClient needs to support client socket bind address config
by William DeCoste (JIRA)
William DeCoste created AS7-6223:
------------------------------------
Summary: org.jboss.as.protocol.ProtocolChannelClient needs to support client socket bind address config
Key: AS7-6223
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6223
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: CLI
Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final
Reporter: William DeCoste
Assignee: William DeCoste
OpenShift requires that the client socket bind address be set to the OPENSHIFT_INTENRAL_IP loopback. ProtocolChannelClient currently does not support config for the bind address. connect(..) should be calling
return endpoint.connect("remote", bindAddress, destAddress, builder.getMap(), actualHandler, sslContext);
instead of
return endpoint.connect(uri, builder.getMap(), actualHandler, sslContext);
and expose bindAddress config
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6222) JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes should not support expressions
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Brian Stansberry created AS7-6222:
-------------------------------------
Summary: JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes should not support expressions
Key: AS7-6222
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6222
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: Domain Management, JCA
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.2.0.Alpha1
These "name" attributes represent part of the address of a resource. Resource address elements cannot support expressions, because their value needs to be resolvable
1) before all system property values are known
2) on the master host controller, which may have different resolution sources from other HCs or the servers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6222) JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes should not support expressions
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Brian Stansberry commented on AS7-6222:
---------------------------------------
I plan to fix this for 7.2 even if we don't fix the parent issue, because any use of an expression for these is broken.
> JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes should not support expressions
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6222
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6222
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Domain Management, JCA
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 7.2.0.Alpha1
>
>
> These "name" attributes represent part of the address of a resource. Resource address elements cannot support expressions, because their value needs to be resolvable
> 1) before all system property values are known
> 2) on the master host controller, which may have different resolution sources from other HCs or the servers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6221) JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes are read-write
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Brian Stansberry commented on AS7-6221:
---------------------------------------
I put a 7.3 Fix Version on this because I don't want to deal with compatibility issues at this point in the 7.2 cycle. If it turns out this only became read-write during 7.2 development, then we should fix it in 7.2.
> JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes are read-write
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6221
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6221
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management, JCA
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Stefano Maestri
> Fix For: 7.3.0.Alpha1
>
>
> The "name" attributes for workmanager and bootstrap-context resources are read-write and should be read-only. They represent the value of the last element of the resource address and thus should not be changed independently of adding/removing the resource.
> Where we find these "name" attributes we've been converting their handling such that when they get registered in ManagementResourceRegistration, it is done like this:
> mrr.registerReadOnlyAttribute(NAME, ReadResourceNameOperationStepHandler.INSTANCE);
> where "NAME" is an AttributeDefinition.
> With that, the "add" handler for the resource shouldn't store the name in the model.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6221) JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes are read-write
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Brian Stansberry created AS7-6221:
-------------------------------------
Summary: JCA workmanager and bootstrap-context "name" attributes are read-write
Key: AS7-6221
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6221
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management, JCA
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Stefano Maestri
Fix For: 7.3.0.Alpha1
The "name" attributes for workmanager and bootstrap-context resources are read-write and should be read-only. They represent the value of the last element of the resource address and thus should not be changed independently of adding/removing the resource.
Where we find these "name" attributes we've been converting their handling such that when they get registered in ManagementResourceRegistration, it is done like this:
mrr.registerReadOnlyAttribute(NAME, ReadResourceNameOperationStepHandler.INSTANCE);
where "NAME" is an AttributeDefinition.
With that, the "add" handler for the resource shouldn't store the name in the model.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6220) WebJASPIAuthenticator ignores descriptor roles if GroupPrincipalCallback is not empty
by Stefan Guilhen (JIRA)
Stefan Guilhen created AS7-6220:
-----------------------------------
Summary: WebJASPIAuthenticator ignores descriptor roles if GroupPrincipalCallback is not empty
Key: AS7-6220
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6220
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Web
Affects Versions: 7.1.3.Final (EAP)
Reporter: Stefan Guilhen
Assignee: Stefan Guilhen
Fix For: 7.2.0.Alpha1, 7.1.4.Final (EAP)
The fix for AS7-5735 introduced a regression in the TCK tests because now the WebJASPIAuthenticator is ignoring the descriptor roles when a non-empty GroupPrincipalCallback is returned from the JASPI authentication.
The authenticator must add the descriptor roles to the set of roles retrieved from the GroupPrincipalCallback
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6068) jar file system is broken again (regression)
by Alvin Thompson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Alvin Thompson edited comment on AS7-6068 at 12/19/12 12:04 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Test case? Add a security provider jar to your war/ear and attempt to use it. I used bouncycastle but I imagine it doesn't make a difference. Before the security provider can load, the jar needs to be validated. This is done by accessing the files through the jar file system (provided by jboss) and inspecting them (I imagine it does something like comparing the file's checksum to a known value). Apparently, the jar file system does not properly handle the "jar within a jar" scenario. Please look at the related bug for details.
was (Author: alvint):
Test case? Add a security provider jar to your war/ear and attempt to use it. I used bouncycastle but I imagine it doesn't make a difference. Before the security provider can load, the jar needs to be validated. This is done by accessing the files through the jar file system (provided by jboss) and inspecting them (I imagine it does something like comparing the file's checksum to a known value). Apparently, the jar file system does not properly handle the "jar within a jar" scenario.
> jar file system is broken again (regression)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6068
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6068
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
> Reporter: Alvin Thompson
> Assignee: JBoss SET
> Priority: Critical
>
> Similar to issue JBAS-7882, you cannot bundle a security provider in a WAR/EAR, because JBOSS's jar file system becomes confused when there are JARs nested in other JARs/WARs/EARs, which is pretty much always.
> This was supposedly fixed in previous versions, but it's back in 7.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6068) jar file system is broken again (regression)
by Alvin Thompson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Alvin Thompson commented on AS7-6068:
-------------------------------------
Test case? Add a security provider jar to your war/ear and attempt to use it. I used bouncycastle but I imagine it doesn't make a difference. Before the security provider can load, the jar needs to be validated. This is done by accessing the files through the jar file system (provided by jboss) and inspecting them (I imagine it does something like comparing the file's checksum to a known value). Apparently, the jar file system does not properly handle the "jar within a jar" scenario.
> jar file system is broken again (regression)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6068
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6068
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 7.1.1.Final
> Reporter: Alvin Thompson
> Assignee: JBoss SET
> Priority: Critical
>
> Similar to issue JBAS-7882, you cannot bundle a security provider in a WAR/EAR, because JBOSS's jar file system becomes confused when there are JARs nested in other JARs/WARs/EARs, which is pretty much always.
> This was supposedly fixed in previous versions, but it's back in 7.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years