[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-377) Provide "destroy-queue" and "destroy-topic" operations to CLI
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-377:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.Final
> Provide "destroy-queue" and "destroy-topic" operations to CLI
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-377
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-377
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: CLI, JMS
> Reporter: Miroslav Novak
> Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1, 8.0.0.Final
>
>
> Operations "destroy-queue" and "destroy-topic" would destroy queue/topic with all its messages and subscriptions.
> They would be used under for example /subsystem=messaging/hornetq-server=default/jms-queue=testQueue or /subsystem=messaging/hornetq-server=default/jms-topic=testTopic.
> The goal is to provide a simple way how to get rid of those objects to administrators.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-378) Provide ability to detect server shutdown
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-378:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.Final
> Provide ability to detect server shutdown
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-378
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-378
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Thomas Diesler
> Assignee: Jason Greene
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1, 8.0.0.Final
>
>
> The general use case is that a subsystem maintains state (on behalf of a deployment) that should be removed on explicit user interaction (i.e. mgmt op) but not on subsystem/server shutdown. This should also work in the domain case. Perhaps the ApplicationServerService (or similar) could be queried about whether it is currently shutting down.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-447) Connection Reauthentication and Security Propagation
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-447:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.Final
(was: 8.0.0.CR1)
> Connection Reauthentication and Security Propagation
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-447
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-447
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: EJB, Remoting, Security
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 8.0.0.Final
>
>
> This task is a top level task to coordinate the addition of support for switching to different security identities on an existing connection over Remoting.
> This is to predominantly cover two major scenarios: -
> - Clients using a single connection but require different calls to be executed as different users, in this case the client has the information required to start a new authentication as a different user.
> - Server to server communication where the first server has already authenticated a remote user - for this scenario the first server needs a way to tell the second server what identity to run the call as.
> The following document is building up the requirements and design considerations and decisions: -
> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/ConnectionRe-AuthenticationAndSecurityPr...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-442) Review of AccessController and PrivilegedAction use across AS7
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-442:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.Final
(was: 8.0.0.CR1)
> Review of AccessController and PrivilegedAction use across AS7
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-442
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-442
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 8.0.0.Final
>
>
> The following needs reviewing across AS7: -
> - On demand instantiation of PrivilegedActions where singletons would suffice (Consider frequency of calls, gc may be preferable).
> - Use of AccessController even though there is no SecurityManager set.
> - Code duplication, in every case I have seen so far the code is the same regardless of if PRIVILEGED or NON_PRIVILEGED
> - Utility methods with visibility too high.
> - In depth review of the other methods, i.e. if the first thing a public method does is set the class loader based on a parameter passed in it could be used badly - it may even be a justification for that method to NOT use a PrivilegedAction.
> - Code that requires to be executed using a PrivilegedAction should also be double checked that it is not doing too much as the identity of the caller.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-441) If possible, eliminate the NonTxEmCloser by closing the EM immediately after each EM invocation
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-441:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.Final
(was: 8.0.0.CR1)
> If possible, eliminate the NonTxEmCloser by closing the EM immediately after each EM invocation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-441
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-441
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JPA / Hibernate
> Reporter: Scott Marlow
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 8.0.0.Final
>
>
> For Queries, handoff the EntityManager to a Query object wrapper and have the Query object finalizer close the EntityManager.
> Make sure that we respect JPA 2.0 section 3.8.6 (detach objects returned from Query object).
> 1. Methods that return a Query, will hand off the EM to the Query object wrapper.
> 2. Other methods will close the EM at the end of the EM method invocation.
> When making this change, make sure that performance doesn't degrade. The cost of this change, will be that each (transaction scoped non-tx) EM invocation will create a new persistence context, but we can eliminate the NonTxEmCloser which has its own overhead.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 6 months