[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6615) Invalid definition for HC root resource remote domain controller
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Kabir Khan edited comment on AS7-6615 at 3/28/13 8:44 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------
I have done the definition part as part of my work on "better ignoring of non-affected slave data" AS7-6808
was (Author: kabirkhan):
I have done the definition part as part of my work on "better ignoring of non-affected slave data"
> Invalid definition for HC root resource remote domain controller
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6615
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6615
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: EAP 6.1.0.Alpha (7.2.0.Final)
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Kabir Khan
> Fix For: 8.0.0.Alpha1
>
>
> HostResourceDefinition.DC_REMOTE does not include the security-realm and username fields.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6778) Configure EJB3/MDB with an individual thread pool for each EJB.
by jaikiran pai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
jaikiran pai commented on AS7-6778:
-----------------------------------
By the way, if there's a specific example/usecase you are stuck with or are having problems trying to improve performance with, I would like to understand that and see if adding this feature will help solve it. I don't mind adding this feature if it's going to solve those requirements.
> Configure EJB3/MDB with an individual thread pool for each EJB.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6778
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6778
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: EAP 6.1.0.Alpha (7.2.0.Final)
> Reporter: Jeremy Whiting
> Assignee: jaikiran pai
>
> For performance of an application to be scalable I need to configure sometimes a thread pool to an EJB. The pool is not shared with other EJB in the deployed application.
> For example
> PoolA - EJB Dog
> PoolB - EJB Cat
> To configure this the ability no define the thread pool name for an EJB. Rather than an EJB to the shared thread pool as it currently works.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-6778) Configure EJB3/MDB with an individual thread pool for each EJB.
by jaikiran pai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
jaikiran pai commented on AS7-6778:
-----------------------------------
I'm sorry, I'm still not sure what's being asked for here.
>> Furthermore, the thread pools could be assigned to specific components, otherwise they will use the default one.
I don't understand this. Local invocations will keep using the originating thread. Assigning a thread pool to a component wouldn't have any affect on that.
>> We are having some bottleneck when increasing the threads for each components.
I think we should start looking at what those problems are and then figure out if adding some new feature is relevant.
> Configure EJB3/MDB with an individual thread pool for each EJB.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-6778
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6778
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: EAP 6.1.0.Alpha (7.2.0.Final)
> Reporter: Jeremy Whiting
> Assignee: jaikiran pai
>
> For performance of an application to be scalable I need to configure sometimes a thread pool to an EJB. The pool is not shared with other EJB in the deployed application.
> For example
> PoolA - EJB Dog
> PoolB - EJB Cat
> To configure this the ability no define the thread pool name for an EJB. Rather than an EJB to the shared thread pool as it currently works.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-72) Potential memory leak in StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl#execute when fireAllRules throwing RuntimeException
by Mario Fusco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Mario Fusco resolved DROOLS-72.
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.6
6.0.0.Alpha1
Resolution: Done
> Potential memory leak in StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl#execute when fireAllRules throwing RuntimeException
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-72
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-72
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Affects Versions: 5.5
> Reporter: Trung Nguyen
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Fix For: 5.6, 6.0.0.Alpha1
>
>
> when {{ksession.fireAllRules()}} throws RuntimeException, it cause {{ksession}} never gets released.
> {code:lang=java}
> public void execute(Object object) {
> StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = newWorkingMemory();
> ksession.insert( object );
> ksession.fireAllRules( );
> ksession.dispose();
> }
> public void execute(Iterable objects) {
> StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = newWorkingMemory();
> for ( Object object : objects ) {
> ksession.insert( object );
> }
> ksession.fireAllRules( );
> ksession.dispose();
> }
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 1 month