[JBoss JIRA] (JBMETA-379) Missing param-name in a web.xml causes NullPointerException during deployment
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBMETA-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on JBMETA-379:
------------------------------------------------
Paul Gier <pgier(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1125421|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125421] from MODIFIED to ON_QA
> Missing param-name in a web.xml causes NullPointerException during deployment
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBMETA-379
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBMETA-379
> Project: JBoss Metadata
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: web
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Jay Kumar SenSharma
> Assignee: Jean-Frederic Clere
> Fix For: 8.0.1.Final
>
> Attachments: ContextParamNullDemo.war
>
>
> - While deploying a WAR, If the web.xml file is used which has context <param-value> defined, However it has missing <param-name> then it causes NullPointerException as following:
> {code}
> 00:12:09,583 INFO [org.jboss.as.server.deployment] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYSRV0027: Starting deployment of "ContextParamNullDemo.war" (runtime-name: "ContextParamNullDemo.war")
> 00:12:09,591 ERROR [org.jboss.msc.service.fail] (MSC service thread 1-7) MSC000001: Failed to start service jboss.deployment.unit."ContextParamNullDemo.war".PARSE: org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service jboss.deployment.unit."ContextParamNullDemo.war".PARSE: WFLYSRV0153: Failed to process phase PARSE of deployment "ContextParamNullDemo.war"
> at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitPhaseService.start(DeploymentUnitPhaseService.java:163) [wildfly-server-9.0.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT.jar:9.0.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.startService(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1948) [jboss-msc-1.2.2.Final.jar:1.2.2.Final]
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1881) [jboss-msc-1.2.2.Final.jar:1.2.2.Final]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.jboss.as.jsf.deployment.JSFVersionProcessor.deploy(JSFVersionProcessor.java:91)
> at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitPhaseService.start(DeploymentUnitPhaseService.java:156) [wildfly-server-9.0.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT.jar:9.0.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT]
> ... 5 more
> 00:12:09,598 ERROR [org.jboss.as.controller.management-operation] (DeploymentScanner-threads - 1) WFLYCTL0013: Operation ("deploy") failed - address: ([("deployment" => "ContextParamNullDemo.war")]) - failure description: {"WFLYCTL0080: Failed services" => {"jboss.deployment.unit.\"ContextParamNullDemo.war\".PARSE" => "org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service jboss.deployment.unit.\"ContextParamNullDemo.war\".PARSE: WFLYSRV0153: Failed to process phase PARSE of deployment \"ContextParamNullDemo.war\"
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException"}}
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-628) DecisionTable incorrectly parsed
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration updated DROOLS-628:
-------------------------------------------
Bugzilla Update: Perform
Bugzilla References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150308
> DecisionTable incorrectly parsed
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-628
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-628
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mario Fusco
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Fix For: 6.2.0.CR1
>
>
> 5.2.0.CR1 creates incorrect drl from decision table. With 5.1.0.M1 the drl for the same decision table is correct.
> Wrong DRL from 5.2.0.CR1:
> rule "ProcessState"
> salience 65522
> ruleflow-group "CompleteSubOrder"
> activation-group "ProcessState"
> when
> $m:ModifiedMarker(processState==null, state ==null)
> $s:SubOrder
> then
> $m.setIsModified(true);
> $s.setProcessState(ProcessState.CREATED);
> end
> Correct DRL with 5.1.0.M1:
> rule "ProcessState"
> salience 65522
> ruleflow-group "CompleteSubOrder"
> activation-group "ProcessState"
> when
> $m:ModifiedMarker()
> $s:SubOrder(processState==null, state ==null)
> then
> $m.setIsModified(true);
> $s.setProcessState(ProcessState.CREATED);
> end
> The difference is that the constraints are put to $m instead of putting them to $s.
> The behaviour in 5.2.0.CR1 is the same for all decision tables in my project and prevents me from upgrading to newer drools versions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3889) JMX monitoring is extremely memory inefficient
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration updated WFLY-3889:
------------------------------------------
Bugzilla Update: Perform
Bugzilla References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150304
> JMX monitoring is extremely memory inefficient
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3889
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3889
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management, JMX
> Affects Versions: JBoss AS7 7.1.1.Final, 9.0.0.Alpha1
> Reporter: Koen Janssens
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
>
> When reading any JMX attribute(s), I have noticed a noticeable impact on the performance of our system. After attaching a profiler, I see that getting a single attribute of a JMX bean (either using remoting or using jconsole) is generating thousands of objects, that have to cleaned up by the GC. For instance, 6000 instances of the ModelNode class are created.
> A clone is made of the complete management model before executing any JMX operation. This happens in the OperationContextImpl.readResourceFromRoot class.
> More background on associated forum thread
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months