[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3179) Dynamic Deployment of Security Domain
by shinzey shinzey (JIRA)
shinzey shinzey created WFLY-3179:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Dynamic Deployment of Security Domain
Key: WFLY-3179
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3179
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Security
Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
Environment: WildFly 8.0.0.Final
Reporter: shinzey shinzey
Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
In JBoss 6, security domains can be dynamically deployed using jboss-beans.xml, which is not working in WildFly 8. It would be quite useful to bring back this feature, so that no manual operations or extra scripts are needed to create security domains during application deployment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3178) Update Remoting to 4.0.3.Final
by David Lloyd (JIRA)
David Lloyd created WFLY-3178:
---------------------------------
Summary: Update Remoting to 4.0.3.Final
Key: WFLY-3178
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3178
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Component Upgrade
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Remoting
Reporter: David Lloyd
Assignee: David Lloyd
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 8.0.1.Final
This update prevents a potentially nasty spin loop (REM3-186).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1815) TP: sending a message to a non-existent physical address takes too much time
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban resolved JGRP-1815.
----------------------------
Resolution: Done
> TP: sending a message to a non-existent physical address takes too much time
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1815
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1815
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.5
>
>
> When sending a message in the transport, e.g. a message batch, and one or more destinations have no physical addresses in {{logical_addr_cache}}, then we loop {{physical_addr_max_fetch_attempts}} (default: 3) times and also sleep a random number of ms (in range [1..500]).
> This delays the sending of other messages in the same batch, or of other messages in general. Also, if TransferQueueBundler is used, the transfer queue might get filled, so other sender threads are blocked.
> SOLUTION:
> * Remove the loop when sending a message: if the physical address for a message is not found, simply send a discovery request and drop the message
> * The discovery request needs to be sent on a separate thread, as calling {{up(Event)}} directly could also delay the sending of the message or message batch.
> * JGRP-1814 will also help, as connections to left members are closed, and therefore not finding a physical address for a destination should be rare
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1814) No physical address for X; dropping message
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban resolved JGRP-1814.
----------------------------
Resolution: Done
> No physical address for X; dropping message
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1814
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1814
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.5
>
>
> When we have view \{A,B\} and B leaves, then the following happens in UNICAST3:
> * B sends a LEAVE-REQ to A
> * A sends a LEAVE-RSP to B
> * Because the LEAVE-RSP is reliable, A keeps sending the LEAVE-RSP to B until it receives an ACK for the LEAVE-RSP
> * However, when B receives the LEAVE-RSP, it marks its connection to be acked, which means that when the next retransmission kicks in, an ACK for the LEAVE-RSP will be sent back to A
> * Before this happens, B leaves: the ACK is never sent to A
> * A keeps resending the LEAVE-RSP until {{max_retransmit_time}} (default=60s) elapses and the connection is closed. However, the connection is only closed after another 60s (default for {{conn_close_timeout}}).
> * Because the reaper removes all entries of {{logical_addr_cache}} before that happens, we're seeing the above warnings
> SOLUTION:
> # Send LEAVE-RSP unreliable. This bypasses UNICAST3 altogether. The leaver won't block forever if the LEAVE-RSP message is dropped, but only for 3 x {{GMS.leave_timeout}} ms
> # Also add a MBR_LEFT event which is sent up and down the stack by GMS when a member left *gracefully*. This allows UNICAST3 to close the connection to a given member *immediately*, stopping unneeded retransmissions to members which left.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 2 months