[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3144) Session replication doesn't work as expected
by Radoslav Husar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Radoslav Husar commented on WFLY-3144:
--------------------------------------
To test, pull in the changes from https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/6097 and patched/master build of Weld.
> Session replication doesn't work as expected
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3144
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3144
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: CDI / Weld, Clustering, EJB
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Tomas Remes
> Assignee: Radoslav Husar
> Fix For: 8.0.1.Final
>
> Attachments: translator.zip
>
>
> I am experimenting with quite simple Stateful SessionScoped bean ( see org.jboss.weld.tests.clustering.translator.TranslatorControllerBean from attached reproducer) and actually there's not any specific exception, but the behavior is at least weird. I haven't tried with plain EJB so far. Reproducible by following steps:
> 1. Run first node with "/bin/standalone.sh -c standalone-ha.xml"
> 2. Run second node with "./bin/standalone.sh -c standalone-ha.xml -Djboss.socket.binding.port-offset=100 -Djboss.node.name=second"
> 3. Build and deploy attached reproducer
> 4. Open 127.0.0.1:8080/translator in your browser and translate something.
> 5. Open 127.0.0.1:8180/translator and note that number of translated sentences is not replicated correctly.
> This works correctly in EAP. I am running with default standalone-ha configuration on oracle's 1.7.0_45 jdk.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3131) isSensitiveValue of class SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint uses incorrect index in java.lang.String.substring method
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-3131:
-----------------------------------------------
Ondrej Lukas <olukas(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1077838|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077838] from ON_QA to VERIFIED
> isSensitiveValue of class SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint uses incorrect index in java.lang.String.substring method
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3131
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3131
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Jay Kumar SenSharma
> Assignee: Jay Kumar SenSharma
>
> The isSensitiveValue(ModelNode value) method of class "org.jboss.as.controller.access.constraint.SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint" seems to be using the incorrect index in java.lang.String.substring method. Which is causing the following exceptions in the logs while executing the following kind of CLI command:
> {code}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=logging/periodic-rotating-file-handler=FILE:write-attribute(name=formatter, value="%d{HH:mm:ss,SSS} %-5p [%c] (${jboss.node.name} %t) %s%E%n")
> {
> "outcome" => "failed",
> "failure-description" => "JBAS014749: Operation handler failed: String index out of range: -15",
> "rolled-back" => true
> }
> {code}
> The Exception can be seen as following in the WildFly Logs:
> {code}
> 21:58:04,821 ERROR [org.jboss.as.controller.management-operation] (management-handler-thread - 25) JBAS014612: Operation ("write-attribute") failed - address: ([
> ("subsystem" => "logging"),
> ("periodic-rotating-file-handler" => "FILE")
> ]): java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -15
> at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1911) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.access.constraint.SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint$Factory.isSensitiveValue(SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint.java:128) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.access.constraint.SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint$Factory.isSensitiveAction(SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint.java:89) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.access.constraint.SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint$Factory.getRequiredConstraint(SensitiveVaultExpressionConstraint.java:81) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.access.rbac.DefaultPermissionFactory.getRequiredPermissions(DefaultPermissionFactory.java:201) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.access.permission.ManagementPermissionAuthorizer.authorize(ManagementPermissionAuthorizer.java:100) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.access.management.DelegatingConfigurableAuthorizer.authorize(DelegatingConfigurableAuthorizer.java:98) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.OperationContextImpl.getBasicAuthorizationResponse(OperationContextImpl.java:1153) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.OperationContextImpl.authorize(OperationContextImpl.java:1055) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.OperationContextImpl.authorize(OperationContextImpl.java:1015) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.OperationContextImpl.getResourceRegistration(OperationContextImpl.java:265) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.operations.global.WriteAttributeHandler.execute(WriteAttributeHandler.java:72) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:591) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:469) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStepInternal(AbstractOperationContext.java:273) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeOperation(AbstractOperationContext.java:268) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.internalExecute(ModelControllerImpl.java:272) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.execute(ModelControllerImpl.java:146) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler.doExecute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:174) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler.access$300(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:105) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler$1$1.run(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:125) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler$1$1.run(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:121) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:415) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AccessAuditContext.doAs(AccessAuditContext.java:94) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler$1.execute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:121) [wildfly-controller-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$2$1.doExecute(AbstractMessageHandler.java:283) [wildfly-protocol-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$AsyncTaskRunner.run(AbstractMessageHandler.java:504) [wildfly-protocol-8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:8.0.1.Final-SNAPSHOT]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
> at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:122) [jboss-threads-2.1.1.Final.jar:2.1.1.Final]
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years
[JBoss JIRA] (JBJCA-1159) DB Connections leaked if TX is not active after retrieving a connection
by Shrihari Chakrapani (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Shrihari Chakrapani commented on JBJCA-1159:
--------------------------------------------
An example of how acquiring a lock can fail, if a TX timesout
{noformat}
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No transaction is running
at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionSynchronizationRegistryImple.getTransactionImple(TransactionSynchronizationRegistryImple.java:232)
at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionSynchronizationRegistryImple.getResource(TransactionSynchronizationRegistryImple.java:125)
at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.pool.AbstractPool.getLock(AbstractPool.java:264)
at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.pool.AbstractPool.getTransactionNewConnection(AbstractPool.java:500)
at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.pool.AbstractPool.getConnection(AbstractPool.java:374)
at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.AbstractConnectionManager.getManagedConnection(AbstractConnectionManager.java:329)
at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.tx.TxConnectionManagerImpl.getManagedConnection(TxConnectionManagerImpl.java:368)
at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.AbstractConnectionManager.allocateConnection(AbstractConnectionManager.java:464)
at org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.WrapperDataSource.getConnection(WrapperDataSource.java:139)
at org.hibernate.ejb.connection.InjectedDataSourceConnectionProvider.getConnection(InjectedDataSourceConnectionProvider.java:70)
at org.hibernate.internal.AbstractSessionImpl$NonContextualJdbcConnectionAccess.obtainConnection(AbstractSessionImpl.java:292)
at org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.internal.LogicalConnectionImpl.obtainConnection(LogicalConnectionImpl.java:214)
at org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.internal.LogicalConnectionImpl.getConnection(LogicalConnectionImpl.java:157)
at org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.internal.StatementPreparerImpl.connection(StatementPreparerImpl.java:56)
at org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.internal.StatementPreparerImpl$5.doPrepare(StatementPreparerImpl.java:161)
at org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.internal.StatementPreparerImpl$StatementPreparationTemplate.prepareStatement(StatementPreparerImpl.java:182)
at org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.internal.StatementPreparerImpl.prepareQueryStatement(StatementPreparerImpl.java:159)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.prepareQueryStatement(Loader.java:1854)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.executeQueryStatement(Loader.java:1831)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.executeQueryStatement(Loader.java:1811)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQuery(Loader.java:899)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQueryAndInitializeNonLazyCollections(Loader.java:341)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doList(Loader.java:2516)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doList(Loader.java:2502)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.listIgnoreQueryCache(Loader.java:2332)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.list(Loader.java:2327)
at org.hibernate.loader.hql.QueryLoader.list(QueryLoader.java:490)
at org.hibernate.hql.internal.ast.QueryTranslatorImpl.list(QueryTranslatorImpl.java:355)
at org.hibernate.engine.query.spi.HQLQueryPlan.performList(HQLQueryPlan.java:195)
at org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.list(SessionImpl.java:1269)
at org.hibernate.internal.QueryImpl.list(QueryImpl.java:101)
at org.hibernate.ejb.QueryImpl.getResultList(QueryImpl.java:264)
{noformat}
> DB Connections leaked if TX is not active after retrieving a connection
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBJCA-1159
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1159
> Project: IronJacamar
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0.19.Final
> Environment: AS7 EAP6.1
> Reporter: gui borland
> Assignee: Jesper Pedersen
> Priority: Critical
>
> When a connection is retrieved from the MCP, ironjacamar will register it to ongoing JTA transaction. However, if the ongoing TX is not 'active' anymore the connection is lost.
> The code of AbstractPool demonstrates the problem. The call to getLock will throw an exception if the current TX is not active anymore and the cl is not returned to the pool.
> This issue can be reproduced on AS7 by using any EJB that requires a tx and does something with a DB connection. Put a breakpoint in the code below after retrieving the connectionlistener, and then wait for the transaction to timeout. Once that's done, continue the thread. The connection is not release (can be seen in JMX)
> We have noticed this problem regularly during our performance tests.
> {code}
> ConnectionListener cl = mcp.getConnection(subject, cri);
> if (trace)
> log.tracef("Got connection from pool tracked by transaction=%s tx=%s", cl, trackByTransaction);
> TransactionSynchronizationRegistry tsr = getTransactionSynchronizationRegistry();
> Lock lock = getLock();
> try
> {
> lock.lockInterruptibly();
> }
> catch (InterruptedException ie)
> {
> Thread.interrupted();
> throw new ResourceException(bundle.unableObtainLock(), ie);
> }
> {code}
> It seems this issue was introduced by changes done for https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-572
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years
[JBoss JIRA] (JBJCA-1159) DB Connections leaked if TX is not active after retrieving a connection
by gui borland (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
gui borland updated JBJCA-1159:
-------------------------------
Description:
When a connection is retrieved from the MCP, ironjacamar will register it to ongoing JTA transaction. However, if the ongoing TX is not 'active' anymore the connection is lost.
The code of AbstractPool demonstrates the problem. The call to getLock will throw an exception if the current TX is not active anymore and the cl is not returned to the pool.
This issue can be reproduced on AS7 by using any EJB that requires a tx and does something with a DB connection. Put a breakpoint in the code below after retrieving the connectionlistener, and then wait for the transaction to timeout. Once that's done, continue the thread. The connection is not release (can be seen in JMX)
We have noticed this problem regularly during our performance tests.
{code}
ConnectionListener cl = mcp.getConnection(subject, cri);
if (trace)
log.tracef("Got connection from pool tracked by transaction=%s tx=%s", cl, trackByTransaction);
TransactionSynchronizationRegistry tsr = getTransactionSynchronizationRegistry();
Lock lock = getLock();
try
{
lock.lockInterruptibly();
}
catch (InterruptedException ie)
{
Thread.interrupted();
throw new ResourceException(bundle.unableObtainLock(), ie);
}
{code}
It seems this issue was introduced by changes done for https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-572
was:
When a connection is retrieved from the MCP, ironjacamar will register it to ongoing JTA transaction. However, if the ongoing TX is not 'active' anymore the connection is lost.
> DB Connections leaked if TX is not active after retrieving a connection
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBJCA-1159
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1159
> Project: IronJacamar
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0.19.Final
> Environment: AS7 EAP6.1
> Reporter: gui borland
> Assignee: Jesper Pedersen
> Priority: Critical
>
> When a connection is retrieved from the MCP, ironjacamar will register it to ongoing JTA transaction. However, if the ongoing TX is not 'active' anymore the connection is lost.
> The code of AbstractPool demonstrates the problem. The call to getLock will throw an exception if the current TX is not active anymore and the cl is not returned to the pool.
> This issue can be reproduced on AS7 by using any EJB that requires a tx and does something with a DB connection. Put a breakpoint in the code below after retrieving the connectionlistener, and then wait for the transaction to timeout. Once that's done, continue the thread. The connection is not release (can be seen in JMX)
> We have noticed this problem regularly during our performance tests.
> {code}
> ConnectionListener cl = mcp.getConnection(subject, cri);
> if (trace)
> log.tracef("Got connection from pool tracked by transaction=%s tx=%s", cl, trackByTransaction);
> TransactionSynchronizationRegistry tsr = getTransactionSynchronizationRegistry();
> Lock lock = getLock();
> try
> {
> lock.lockInterruptibly();
> }
> catch (InterruptedException ie)
> {
> Thread.interrupted();
> throw new ResourceException(bundle.unableObtainLock(), ie);
> }
> {code}
> It seems this issue was introduced by changes done for https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-572
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years
[JBoss JIRA] (JBJCA-1159) DB Connections leaked if TX is not active after retrieving a connection
by gui borland (JIRA)
gui borland created JBJCA-1159:
----------------------------------
Summary: DB Connections leaked if TX is not active after retrieving a connection
Key: JBJCA-1159
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1159
Project: IronJacamar
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 1.0.19.Final
Environment: AS7 EAP6.1
Reporter: gui borland
Assignee: Jesper Pedersen
Priority: Critical
When a connection is retrieved from the MCP, ironjacamar will register it to ongoing JTA transaction. However, if the ongoing TX is not 'active' anymore the connection is lost.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years