[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-775) Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
by Federico Bertola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Federico Bertola updated DROOLS-775:
------------------------------------
Description:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower than the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 100k iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
drools 6.2.0.Final
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
was:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 100k iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
drools 6.2.0.Final
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
> Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-775
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final, 6.1.0.Final, 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Environment: Ubuntu 14.10 x64, jdk 8
> Reporter: Federico Bertola
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Labels: regression
> Attachments: drools-test.zip
>
>
> I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower than the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
> For example, after 100k iterations:
> droosl 5.0.1
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 549.27 events/second
> ...
> drools 6.2.0.Final
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 198.58 events/second
> ...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-775) Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
by Federico Bertola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Federico Bertola updated DROOLS-775:
------------------------------------
Description:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 100k iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
drools 6.2.0.Final
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
was:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 10ok iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
drools 6.2.0.Final
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
> Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-775
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final, 6.1.0.Final, 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Environment: Ubuntu 14.10 x64, jdk 8
> Reporter: Federico Bertola
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Labels: regression
> Attachments: drools-test.zip
>
>
> I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
> For example, after 100k iterations:
> droosl 5.0.1
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 549.27 events/second
> ...
> drools 6.2.0.Final
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 198.58 events/second
> ...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-775) Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
by Federico Bertola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Federico Bertola updated DROOLS-775:
------------------------------------
Description:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 10ok iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
drools 6.2.0.Final
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
was:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 10k iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
drools 6.2.0.Final
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
> Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-775
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final, 6.1.0.Final, 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Environment: Ubuntu 14.10 x64, jdk 8
> Reporter: Federico Bertola
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Labels: regression
> Attachments: drools-test.zip
>
>
> I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
> For example, after 10ok iterations:
> droosl 5.0.1
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 549.27 events/second
> ...
> drools 6.2.0.Final
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 198.58 events/second
> ...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-775) Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
by Federico Bertola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Federico Bertola updated DROOLS-775:
------------------------------------
Description:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 10k iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
drools 6.2.0.Final
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
was:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 10k iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
{{
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
}}
drools 6.2.0.Final
{{
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
}}
> Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-775
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final, 6.1.0.Final, 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Environment: Ubuntu 14.10 x64, jdk 8
> Reporter: Federico Bertola
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Labels: regression
> Attachments: drools-test.zip
>
>
> I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
> For example, after 10k iterations:
> droosl 5.0.1
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 549.27 events/second
> ...
> drools 6.2.0.Final
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 198.58 events/second
> ...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-775) Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
by Federico Bertola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Federico Bertola updated DROOLS-775:
------------------------------------
Description:
I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
For example, after 10k iterations:
droosl 5.0.1
{{
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 549.27 events/second
...
}}
drools 6.2.0.Final
{{
-- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
count = 100000
mean rate = 198.58 events/second
...
}}
was:I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
> Performance degradation with objects with many properties in working memory.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-775
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-775
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final, 6.1.0.Final, 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Environment: Ubuntu 14.10 x64, jdk 8
> Reporter: Federico Bertola
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Labels: regression
> Attachments: drools-test.zip
>
>
> I experience some major performance degradation while migrating from drools 5.0.1 to 6.x. I'm inserting objects with many properties into the working memory and firing some very basic rules which will match against a very small subset of those properties. I expected that the older version of Drools, which uses pure reflection, to be somewhat slower that the newer, which uses some clever ASM optimization., but this is not the case. I've also noticed that if the required properties are scattered across multiple level of hierarchy, the performance issue will aggravate.
> For example, after 10k iterations:
> droosl 5.0.1
> {{
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools5.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 549.27 events/second
> ...
> }}
> drools 6.2.0.Final
> {{
> -- Meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> org.acme.test.drools6.DroolsPerformance.analized
> count = 100000
> mean rate = 198.58 events/second
> ...
> }}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months