[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2807) Messaging subsystem runtime-queue resource is not registered as "runtime-only"
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Brian Stansberry reassigned WFLY-2807:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: Kabir Khan (was: Brian Stansberry)
Resolution: Done
> Messaging subsystem runtime-queue resource is not registered as "runtime-only"
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2807
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2807
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management, JMS
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.CR1
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Kabir Khan
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
>
>
> The runtime-queue resource only exists at runtime but isn't registered as such. I noticed this as ManagementClient does a recursive read-resource of the entire tree, but with include-runtime=false, but a CI run showed a failure reading one of these resources anyway:
> ```
> 21:01:01,754 ERROR [org.jboss.as.controller.management-operation] (management-handler-thread - 4) JBAS014613: Operation ("read-attribute") failed - address: ([
> ("subsystem" => "messaging"),
> ("hornetq-server" => "default"),
> ("runtime-queue" => "jms.tempqueue.661a6b15-7863-4d6c-b4b1-f8d62d294ea5")
> ]) - failure description: "JBAS011676: No resource exists at address [
> (\"subsystem\" => \"messaging\"),
> (\"hornetq-server\" => \"default\"),
> (\"runtime-queue\" => \"jms.tempqueue.661a6b15-7863-4d6c-b4b1-f8d62d294ea5\")
> ]"
> ```
> Doing read-resource with these is a bit problematic in any case, since a bunch of read-attribute calls get executed as steps (that's what the above was) but the resource can disappear in the middle. But that's a separate problem.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
11 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-263) Cancelling management op on slave HC tree is broken
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-263:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0.Alpha1
(was: 1.0.0.Beta6)
> Cancelling management op on slave HC tree is broken
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-263
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-263
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha9
> Reporter: James Livingston
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 2.0.0.Alpha1
>
> Attachments: unundeployable.zip
>
>
> If you have a DC with a slave HC, and perform a management operation which gets stuck, non-progressing operations will be reported for both the DC and the slave HC via:
> /host=master/core-service=management/service=management-operations:find-non-progressing-operation
> /host=slave/core-service=management/service=management-operations:find-non-progressing-operation
> Cancelling the operation under /host=master works as expected, pushing the cancellation down to the slave and the controllers become responsive again.
> If however you attempt to cancel the operation under /host=slave, it goes bad. { "outcome" => "success", "result" => undefined } is reported in the CLI, but the controllers are still unresponsive.
> Running :find-non-progressing-operation against the slave will report the {outcome=success,result=undefined} rather than that no non-progressing operations were found, and active-operation=*:read-resource() shows it as not cancelled.
> Once you attempt to cancel it on a slave, attempting to cancel it under /host=master will report success, but leave the slave op in a weird state, and things requiring the controller lock (such as the web UI) will still not respond.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
11 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-263) Cancelling management op on slave HC tree is broken
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry reopened WFCORE-263:
-------------------------------------
Reopening. The test I added introduced instability in the testsuite. I don't know if that was due to the test or the fix; in any case I reverted the patch.
> Cancelling management op on slave HC tree is broken
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-263
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-263
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha9
> Reporter: James Livingston
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 1.0.0.Beta6
>
> Attachments: unundeployable.zip
>
>
> If you have a DC with a slave HC, and perform a management operation which gets stuck, non-progressing operations will be reported for both the DC and the slave HC via:
> /host=master/core-service=management/service=management-operations:find-non-progressing-operation
> /host=slave/core-service=management/service=management-operations:find-non-progressing-operation
> Cancelling the operation under /host=master works as expected, pushing the cancellation down to the slave and the controllers become responsive again.
> If however you attempt to cancel the operation under /host=slave, it goes bad. { "outcome" => "success", "result" => undefined } is reported in the CLI, but the controllers are still unresponsive.
> Running :find-non-progressing-operation against the slave will report the {outcome=success,result=undefined} rather than that no non-progressing operations were found, and active-operation=*:read-resource() shows it as not cancelled.
> Once you attempt to cancel it on a slave, attempting to cancel it under /host=master will report success, but leave the slave op in a weird state, and things requiring the controller lock (such as the web UI) will still not respond.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
11 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-4571) Merge the wildfly BOMs into a single BOM
by Paul Gier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Paul Gier commented on WFLY-4571:
---------------------------------
How would the tools dependency management affect the test behavior? For the arquillian deps for example, the BOM should only set the versions of the dependencies if they are already in the build. They shouldn't have any effect on a build that doesn't have those dependencies. Same with the wildfly-maven-plugin, since it's in "pluginManagement" instead of "plugins", the BOM should only have the effect of setting the version for the plugin if you already added it to the build. But I might be missing something.
> Merge the wildfly BOMs into a single BOM
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-4571
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4571
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: Paul Gier
> Assignee: Paul Gier
>
> We had some discussion on the jbossdeveloper list [1] about merging the current wildfly/eap boms into a single one instead of a separate bom for each use case.
> The only problematic BOM might be the hibernate3 bom because this includes dependencies which conflict with the hibernate 4 bom. So the hibernate 3 bom will probably need to remain separate.
> [1]http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbossdeveloper/2015-April/000347.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
11 years