[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-5241) Update messaging subsystem descriptions to properly report path cardinality
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Brian Stansberry created WFLY-5241:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Update messaging subsystem descriptions to properly report path cardinality
Key: WFLY-5241
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5241
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Task
Components: JMS
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 10.0.0.CR1
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY10/Description+of+the+Managemen... has been updated to more intelligently report cardinality information about resource registrations, with each reg reporting its own cardinality instead of having the parent report data about the "key" portion of potentially unrelated children.
The two messaging subsystems are actually trying to use the old way for "path" children, so this JIRA is to move to the new way.
Instead of the parent resource reporting there must be 4 and no more than 4 children with key "path", now each of the 4 valid path children types will report that the min-occurs of that type is 1. (The max-occurs is also 1, but that will not be reported as that, per the spec, is the default for a 'singleton' type, and each of the 4 path types is a singleton.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-621) Support legacy slaves when invoking wildcard reads in a domain
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-621:
------------------------------------
Description:
This is a follow-on to WFCORE-282.
The WFCORE-282 solution will not work for requests with address patterns {code}/host=*/server=*{code} or {code}/host=somename/server=*{code} if the host named 'somename' is running a WFCORE version prior to 1.0.0.CR1 (or whatever release first has WFCORE-282 introduced.)
In particular, it won't work with slaves running EAP 6.x.
The problem is with either of those address patterns the DC will send a request addressed to {code}/host=somename/server=*{code} to the slave, and the slave will not be able to handle it, as it won't have the WFCORE-282 logic that lets it identify the relevant servers and send requests on to them.
Potentially this could be fixed by having the DC detect these patterns and not call {code}/host=somename/server=*{code}, instead adding a step to read the server child names from /host=somename and then call /host=somename/server=a, /host=somename/server=b, etc.
was:
This is a follow-on to WFCORE-282.
The WFCORE-282 will not work for requests with address patterns /host=*/server=* or /host=somename/server=* if the host named 'somename' is running a WFCORE version prior to 1.0.0.CR1 (or whatever release first has WFCORE-282 introduced.)
In particular, it won't work with slaves running EAP 6.x.
The problem is with either of those address patterns the DC will send a request addressed to /host=somename/server=* to the slave, and the slave will not be able to handle it, as it won't have the WFCORE-282 logic that lets it identify the relevant servers and send requests on to them.
Potentially this could be fixed by having the DC detect these patterns and not call /host=somename/server=*, instead adding a step to read the server child names from /host=somename and then call /host=somename/server=a, /host=somename/server=b, etc.
> Support legacy slaves when invoking wildcard reads in a domain
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-621
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-621
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0.CR1
>
>
> This is a follow-on to WFCORE-282.
> The WFCORE-282 solution will not work for requests with address patterns {code}/host=*/server=*{code} or {code}/host=somename/server=*{code} if the host named 'somename' is running a WFCORE version prior to 1.0.0.CR1 (or whatever release first has WFCORE-282 introduced.)
> In particular, it won't work with slaves running EAP 6.x.
> The problem is with either of those address patterns the DC will send a request addressed to {code}/host=somename/server=*{code} to the slave, and the slave will not be able to handle it, as it won't have the WFCORE-282 logic that lets it identify the relevant servers and send requests on to them.
> Potentially this could be fixed by having the DC detect these patterns and not call {code}/host=somename/server=*{code}, instead adding a step to read the server child names from /host=somename and then call /host=somename/server=a, /host=somename/server=b, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-395) Improve reporting during deployment hang
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-395:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0.CR1)
> Improve reporting during deployment hang
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-395
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-395
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Environment: http://java.net/jira/browse/EJB_SPEC-60
> java version "1.7.0_09"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.3) (7u9-2.3.3-0ubuntu1~12.10.1)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode)
> Ubuntu 12.10
> Reporter: Carlo de Wolf
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Attachments: deployment-hang-20130205.txt, server.log
>
>
> Management Thread waits indefinitely for, what seems to be, a finished operation.
> {noformat}
> "management-handler-thread - 2" prio=10 tid=0x00007fa1380d0000 nid=0x7683 in Object.wait() [0x00007fa136deb000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> - waiting on <0x00000000e04ae778> (a org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor.awaitContainerStateChangeReport(ContainerStateMonitor.java:158)
> - locked <0x00000000e04ae778> (a org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.awaitContainerStateChangeReport(ModelControllerImpl.java:464)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.OperationContextImpl.awaitModelControllerContainerMonitor(OperationContextImpl.java:148)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:299)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStepInternal(AbstractOperationContext.java:229)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeOperation(AbstractOperationContext.java:224)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.internalExecute(ModelControllerImpl.java:142)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.execute(ModelControllerImpl.java:112)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler.doExecute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:139)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler$1.execute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:108)
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$2$1.doExecute(AbstractMessageHandler.java:296)
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$AsyncTaskRunner.run(AbstractMessageHandler.java:518)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:122)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-395) Improve reporting during deployment hang
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry reassigned WFCORE-395:
---------------------------------------
Assignee: (was: Brian Stansberry)
> Improve reporting during deployment hang
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-395
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-395
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Environment: http://java.net/jira/browse/EJB_SPEC-60
> java version "1.7.0_09"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.3) (7u9-2.3.3-0ubuntu1~12.10.1)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode)
> Ubuntu 12.10
> Reporter: Carlo de Wolf
> Attachments: deployment-hang-20130205.txt, server.log
>
>
> Management Thread waits indefinitely for, what seems to be, a finished operation.
> {noformat}
> "management-handler-thread - 2" prio=10 tid=0x00007fa1380d0000 nid=0x7683 in Object.wait() [0x00007fa136deb000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> - waiting on <0x00000000e04ae778> (a org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor.awaitContainerStateChangeReport(ContainerStateMonitor.java:158)
> - locked <0x00000000e04ae778> (a org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.awaitContainerStateChangeReport(ModelControllerImpl.java:464)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.OperationContextImpl.awaitModelControllerContainerMonitor(OperationContextImpl.java:148)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:299)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStepInternal(AbstractOperationContext.java:229)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeOperation(AbstractOperationContext.java:224)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.internalExecute(ModelControllerImpl.java:142)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.execute(ModelControllerImpl.java:112)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler.doExecute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:139)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler$1.execute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:108)
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$2$1.doExecute(AbstractMessageHandler.java:296)
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$AsyncTaskRunner.run(AbstractMessageHandler.java:518)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:122)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-597) Where an ObjectTypeAttributeDefinition is in use respect the ResourceOnly setting on contained types for add operations.
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-597:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0.CR1
(was: 2.0.0.Alpha9)
> Where an ObjectTypeAttributeDefinition is in use respect the ResourceOnly setting on contained types for add operations.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-597
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-597
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Tomaz Cerar
> Labels: affects_elytron
> Fix For: 2.0.0.CR1
>
>
> If an ObjectTypeAttributeDefinition contains an attribute definition that has ResourceOnly set then it should be filtered from the automatically generated description for the add operation.
> This may be more related to lists, I currently have: -
> ObjectListAttributeDefinition, which contains ObjectTypeAttributeDefinition, which contains SimpleAttributeDefinition
> It is this final SimpleAttributeDefinition that has ResourceOnly set but it is still showing up in the operation description for add.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 8 months