[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1503) Reading the logging subsystem resource can be slow if several log files exist
by James Perkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
James Perkins commented on WFCORE-1503:
---------------------------------------
Excellent thanks for the confirmation [~pvorb]!
> Reading the logging subsystem resource can be slow if several log files exist
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1503
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1503
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Logging
> Reporter: James Perkins
> Assignee: James Perkins
> Labels: 2.2
> Attachments: wildfly-logging-patch-02.jar
>
>
> The logging subsystem uses a dynamic resource to list log files as resources. These are the files that are allowed to be read or downloaded and are attached to known file handlers.
> When several file handlers are defined the file tree walker is invoked several times per {{read-resource-operation}}. This may be happening for each stage of an operation. Ideally we could either cache the file listing per-operation or only execute at the runtime stage. This may not be an option for dynamic resources however.
> As a result of this poor performance the web console is very slow to load the logging subsystem configuration. This is not an issue with the web console.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1153) Version detection when adding drools runtime doesn't work
by Tomas David (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Tomas David commented on DROOLS-1153:
-------------------------------------
After discussion with [~bbrodt]: proposed solution is to take a version from the manifest file of a one drools runtime jar. This allows to automatically complete the version in drools preferences page.
> Version detection when adding drools runtime doesn't work
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1153
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1153
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: eclipse plugin
> Environment: JBDS 9.1.0.GA
> Drools plugin 6.4.1-Snapshot
> Reporter: Tomas David
> Assignee: Robert (Bob) Brodt
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: reported-by-qe
> Attachments: add_drools_runtime_dialog.png
>
>
> When you add a drools runtime, version is not automatically detected and "Version must be in the form major#.minor#.patch#" text is displayed. User has to specify a version manually instead of automatic detection from binaries.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-429) Incremental redeployment (single file update) over management API
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry commented on WFCORE-429:
-----------------------------------------
I've drafted a requirements doc for this:
https://developer.jboss.org/docs/DOC-55497
I've also got a local prototype branch that does a small bit of this, which I'll link later this week once it gets polished a bit more. At that point it won't have much functionality particularly interesting to a user but it should have a lot of the needed underpinnings.
> Incremental redeployment (single file update) over management API
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-429
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-429
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: CLI, Domain Management
> Reporter: Ondrej Zizka
> Labels: deploy, deployment, incremental, redeployment
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta1
>
>
> (Based on JBDS use case - see EAP6-1)
> See also https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-934058 for notes
> By incremental redeployment, we mean the situation when something is deployed, and after changes (in IDE e.g.), only that single file (.jsp, .xml, .class) would be re-deployed to the server, *over management API* - which is, you'd give it a stream and a path where it belongs in the deployment, and the operation would accept that file and put it to the right place in VFS, clear caches etc.
> Use cases:
> Big .war's, mainly on remote
> Cloud deployments
> Also, you loose sessions etc.
> "JSP recompile on file update" - mgmt API operation - added in WildFly 8?
> Not expected to work in domain mode.
> Stuart said that session persistence is implemented in WFly 8, but not the incremental redeployment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-429) Incremental redeployment (single file update) over management API
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-429:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta1
> Incremental redeployment (single file update) over management API
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-429
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-429
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: CLI, Domain Management
> Reporter: Ondrej Zizka
> Labels: deploy, deployment, incremental, redeployment
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta1
>
>
> (Based on JBDS use case - see EAP6-1)
> See also https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-934058 for notes
> By incremental redeployment, we mean the situation when something is deployed, and after changes (in IDE e.g.), only that single file (.jsp, .xml, .class) would be re-deployed to the server, *over management API* - which is, you'd give it a stream and a path where it belongs in the deployment, and the operation would accept that file and put it to the right place in VFS, clear caches etc.
> Use cases:
> Big .war's, mainly on remote
> Cloud deployments
> Also, you loose sessions etc.
> "JSP recompile on file update" - mgmt API operation - added in WildFly 8?
> Not expected to work in domain mode.
> Stuart said that session persistence is implemented in WFly 8, but not the incremental redeployment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-517) Utilities for the easy atomic manipulation of SSLSession values
by David Lloyd (JIRA)
David Lloyd created ELY-517:
-------------------------------
Summary: Utilities for the easy atomic manipulation of SSLSession values
Key: ELY-517
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-517
Project: WildFly Elytron
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: SSL
Reporter: David Lloyd
Assignee: David Lloyd
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.1.0.Beta6
SSLSession has poor support for atomic getting/setting of session values. Add some util methods which are atomic with respect to each other, and reasonably performant.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1154) Add drools runtime dialog doesn't support version naming of the product
by Tomas David (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Tomas David commented on DROOLS-1154:
-------------------------------------
After discussion with [~bbrodt], this issue will be fixed in 6.4.1 version of drools plugin. It should supports different versions of drools or brms naming.
> Add drools runtime dialog doesn't support version naming of the product
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1154
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1154
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: eclipse plugin
> Environment: JBDS 9.1.0.GA
> Drools plugin 6.4.1-Snapshot
> Reporter: Tomas David
> Assignee: Robert (Bob) Brodt
> Labels: reported-by-qe
> Attachments: add_button.png
>
>
> When you add a drools product runtime and you try to specify a version of runtime (for example "6.4.0.Final-redhat-2"), the Add button of Add Drools runtime dialog is not enabled so it is not possible to complete the runtime adding.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-974) Activation group doesn't work as expected
by Vitali Kviatkouski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Vitali Kviatkouski commented on DROOLS-974:
-------------------------------------------
Any chance to get this fixed in Drools 6.x?
> Activation group doesn't work as expected
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-974
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-974
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Environment: Mac OS X 10.8.3
> jdk 1.7.0_60
> Reporter: Hanbing Luo
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Fix For: 7.0.0.Final
>
>
> In some rare cases activation group doesn't work as expected. For example, two rules with same ruleflow-group and activation-group but different salience are both get fired if reuse kie session.
> Some investigation notes to help address.
> 1) This issue never happen if use a new fresh kie session.
> 2) I also tried to write a drools style unit test (testActivationGroupIssue in ExecutionFlowControlTest.java) but can't reproduce this issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1152) New jBPM maven project can be created only with hello world process
by Jozef Marko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jozef Marko commented on DROOLS-1152:
-------------------------------------
Please notice , that missing radio and check boxes will appear if wizard popup window is resized.
> New jBPM maven project can be created only with hello world process
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1152
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1152
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: eclipse plugin
> Affects Versions: 6.4.0.Final
> Environment: * JBDS 9.1.0.GA
> * drools-jbpm plugin 6.4.1.201604291802
> Reporter: Jozef Marko
> Assignee: Robert (Bob) Brodt
>
> In project created via [1] can be created only hello world sample process while in project created via [2] can be created also more complex sample process and optionally JUnit test.
> [1]
> File -> New -> Other -> jBPM -> jBPM project -> project with example files -> build project using maven
> [2]
> File -> New -> Other -> jBPM -> jBPM project -> project with example files -> build project using Java and jBPM classes
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 8 months