[JBoss JIRA] (JASSIST-261) Issue with javassist on jdk 9b112
by Shigeru Chiba (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Shigeru Chiba commented on JASSIST-261:
---------------------------------------
Yes, just the building process (by maven) needs Java 9.
Since the code refers to a class available only in Java 9 but that class is not instantiated or accessed
if the JVM is not Java 9, the code runs in Java 8. The class files are compiled to be able to run even in Java 6.
> Issue with javassist on jdk 9b112
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: JASSIST-261
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261
> Project: Javassist
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.20.0-GA
> Environment: Javassist with jdk 9b112
> Reporter: Hoang Chuong Tran
> Assignee: Shigeru Chiba
>
> I am migrating a project to java 9, which also uses javassist to generate runtime code.
> One test of mine fails on jdk 9b112 while it passes on jdk 8u77.
> {noformat}
> import static javassist.CtClass.voidType;
> import java.lang.reflect.Method;
> import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
> import java.util.HashMap;
> import java.util.Map;
> import org.junit.Test;
> import javassist.ClassClassPath;
> import javassist.ClassPool;
> import javassist.CtClass;
> import javassist.CtField;
> import javassist.CtMethod;
> import javassist.CtNewMethod;
> public class MyTests {
> public static class MyObject {
> protected Object field;
> Object getField() {return field;}
> public void setField(Object field) {}
> }
> @Test
> public void test() throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
> Class<? extends MyObject> clazz = compile(MyObject.class);
> clazz.newInstance().setField(null);
> }
> /** Compile a transfer class */
> public static synchronized Class<? extends MyObject> compile(Class<?> targetClass) {
> // Determine class setters
> Map<String, Method> setters = extractSetters(targetClass);
> ClassPool classPool = ClassPool.getDefault();
> classPool.insertClassPath(new ClassClassPath(targetClass));
> try {
> // Compile a new transfer class on the fly
> CtClass baseClass = classPool.get(MyObject.class.getName());
> CtClass proxyClass = classPool.makeClass(targetClass.getName() + "_Modified", baseClass);
> for(Method originalSetter : setters.values()) {
> // Create a field to hold the attribute
> Class<?> fieldClass = originalSetter.getParameterTypes()[0];
> CtClass fieldType = classPool.get(fieldClass.getName());
> String fieldName = originalSetter.getName().substring(3);
> CtField field = new CtField(fieldType, fieldName, proxyClass);
> proxyClass.addField(field);
> // Create a setter method to set that field
> CtClass[] parameters = new CtClass[] { fieldType };
> String setterBody = "{ System.out.println(\"Hello World\"); }";
> CtMethod setter = CtNewMethod.make(voidType, originalSetter.getName(), parameters, new CtClass[0], setterBody, proxyClass);
> proxyClass.addMethod(setter);
> }
> Class<? extends MyObject> javaClass = proxyClass.toClass(targetClass.getClassLoader(), targetClass.getProtectionDomain());
> return javaClass;
> } catch(Exception e) {
> throw new RuntimeException("Failure during transfer compilation for " + targetClass, e);
> }
> }
> /** Extract setter methods from a class */
> public static Map<String, Method> extractSetters(Class<?> cls) {
> Map<String, Method> setters = new HashMap<String, Method>();
> for(Method method : cls.getMethods()) {
> // Lookup setter methods
> if(method.getName().startsWith("set")) {
> // Only public setters
> int modifiers = method.getModifiers();
> if(Modifier.isPublic(modifiers)) {
> Class<?>[] exceptions = method.getExceptionTypes();
> Class<?>[] parameters = method.getParameterTypes();
> Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
> if(exceptions.length <= 0 && parameters.length == 1 && "void".equals(returnType.getName())) {
> setters.put(method.getName(), method);
> }
> }
> }
> }
> return setters;
> }
> }
> {noformat}
> On jdk 8u77, the {{compile()}} function returns with success and "Hello world" is printed to the console.
> On jdk 9b112, I got the following exception
> {noformat}
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure during transfer compilation for class MyTests$MyObject
> at MyTests.compile(MyTests.java:68)
> at MyTests.test(MyTests.java:29)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(java.base@9-ea/Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(java.base@9-ea/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(java.base@9-ea/DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(java.base@9-ea/Method.java:531)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:86)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:459)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:670)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:382)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:192)
> Caused by: javassist.NotFoundException: java.lang.Object
> at javassist.ClassPool.get(ClassPool.java:450)
> at MyTests.compile(MyTests.java:51)
> ... 24 more
> {noformat}
> I suspect that is due to the jigsaw integration into the jdk.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JASSIST-261) Issue with javassist on jdk 9b112
by Steve Ebersole (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Steve Ebersole commented on JASSIST-261:
----------------------------------------
[~chiba] the jar [~smarlow] built for me that I used in testing Hibernate was Java 8 compatible (I was able to run the Hibernate tests fine using that SNAPSHOT and Java 8).
Do you mean that just the build is sensitive to the JDK used?
Not being able to work in both Java 8 and 9 at runtime is going to be a big headache.
> Issue with javassist on jdk 9b112
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: JASSIST-261
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261
> Project: Javassist
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.20.0-GA
> Environment: Javassist with jdk 9b112
> Reporter: Hoang Chuong Tran
> Assignee: Shigeru Chiba
>
> I am migrating a project to java 9, which also uses javassist to generate runtime code.
> One test of mine fails on jdk 9b112 while it passes on jdk 8u77.
> {noformat}
> import static javassist.CtClass.voidType;
> import java.lang.reflect.Method;
> import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
> import java.util.HashMap;
> import java.util.Map;
> import org.junit.Test;
> import javassist.ClassClassPath;
> import javassist.ClassPool;
> import javassist.CtClass;
> import javassist.CtField;
> import javassist.CtMethod;
> import javassist.CtNewMethod;
> public class MyTests {
> public static class MyObject {
> protected Object field;
> Object getField() {return field;}
> public void setField(Object field) {}
> }
> @Test
> public void test() throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
> Class<? extends MyObject> clazz = compile(MyObject.class);
> clazz.newInstance().setField(null);
> }
> /** Compile a transfer class */
> public static synchronized Class<? extends MyObject> compile(Class<?> targetClass) {
> // Determine class setters
> Map<String, Method> setters = extractSetters(targetClass);
> ClassPool classPool = ClassPool.getDefault();
> classPool.insertClassPath(new ClassClassPath(targetClass));
> try {
> // Compile a new transfer class on the fly
> CtClass baseClass = classPool.get(MyObject.class.getName());
> CtClass proxyClass = classPool.makeClass(targetClass.getName() + "_Modified", baseClass);
> for(Method originalSetter : setters.values()) {
> // Create a field to hold the attribute
> Class<?> fieldClass = originalSetter.getParameterTypes()[0];
> CtClass fieldType = classPool.get(fieldClass.getName());
> String fieldName = originalSetter.getName().substring(3);
> CtField field = new CtField(fieldType, fieldName, proxyClass);
> proxyClass.addField(field);
> // Create a setter method to set that field
> CtClass[] parameters = new CtClass[] { fieldType };
> String setterBody = "{ System.out.println(\"Hello World\"); }";
> CtMethod setter = CtNewMethod.make(voidType, originalSetter.getName(), parameters, new CtClass[0], setterBody, proxyClass);
> proxyClass.addMethod(setter);
> }
> Class<? extends MyObject> javaClass = proxyClass.toClass(targetClass.getClassLoader(), targetClass.getProtectionDomain());
> return javaClass;
> } catch(Exception e) {
> throw new RuntimeException("Failure during transfer compilation for " + targetClass, e);
> }
> }
> /** Extract setter methods from a class */
> public static Map<String, Method> extractSetters(Class<?> cls) {
> Map<String, Method> setters = new HashMap<String, Method>();
> for(Method method : cls.getMethods()) {
> // Lookup setter methods
> if(method.getName().startsWith("set")) {
> // Only public setters
> int modifiers = method.getModifiers();
> if(Modifier.isPublic(modifiers)) {
> Class<?>[] exceptions = method.getExceptionTypes();
> Class<?>[] parameters = method.getParameterTypes();
> Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
> if(exceptions.length <= 0 && parameters.length == 1 && "void".equals(returnType.getName())) {
> setters.put(method.getName(), method);
> }
> }
> }
> }
> return setters;
> }
> }
> {noformat}
> On jdk 8u77, the {{compile()}} function returns with success and "Hello world" is printed to the console.
> On jdk 9b112, I got the following exception
> {noformat}
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure during transfer compilation for class MyTests$MyObject
> at MyTests.compile(MyTests.java:68)
> at MyTests.test(MyTests.java:29)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(java.base@9-ea/Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(java.base@9-ea/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(java.base@9-ea/DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(java.base@9-ea/Method.java:531)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:86)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:459)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:670)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:382)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:192)
> Caused by: javassist.NotFoundException: java.lang.Object
> at javassist.ClassPool.get(ClassPool.java:450)
> at MyTests.compile(MyTests.java:51)
> ... 24 more
> {noformat}
> I suspect that is due to the jigsaw integration into the jdk.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2098) Discovery: reduce messages when IpAddressUUID is used
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-2098:
--------------------------------
The NAMING part is done in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2104
> Discovery: reduce messages when IpAddressUUID is used
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2098
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2098
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LESS_PING.java
>
>
> Since IpAddressUUID already contains the physical address, we don't need to exchange physical addresses in the discovery phase.
> Investigate whether this leads to reduced messaging in discovery, ie. only the coords might send a response. Once the new member has the view, it automatically knows the IP addresses and ports of all members, as the addresses in the view are of type IpAddressUUID.
> Also investigate whether address:logical_name associations should be done in a separate protocol, e.g. NAMING.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2098) Discovery: reduce messages when IpAddressUUID is used
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban resolved JGRP-2098.
----------------------------
Resolution: Done
> Discovery: reduce messages when IpAddressUUID is used
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2098
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2098
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LESS_PING.java
>
>
> Since IpAddressUUID already contains the physical address, we don't need to exchange physical addresses in the discovery phase.
> Investigate whether this leads to reduced messaging in discovery, ie. only the coords might send a response. Once the new member has the view, it automatically knows the IP addresses and ports of all members, as the addresses in the view are of type IpAddressUUID.
> Also investigate whether address:logical_name associations should be done in a separate protocol, e.g. NAMING.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2104) NAMING: provide logical names when IpAddressUUID is used as addresses
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
Bela Ban created JGRP-2104:
------------------------------
Summary: NAMING: provide logical names when IpAddressUUID is used as addresses
Key: JGRP-2104
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2104
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 4.0
This is a new protocol, typically added somewhere above {{NAKACK2}}. When {{TP.use_ip_addr}} is true, {{IpAddressUUID}} addresses will be used.
If {{Discovery.max_rank_to_reply}} is less than the max rank of the cluster view, not all members will receive discovery responses. They therefore won't have a mapping between the address and the logical name for all members.
{{NAMING}} fixes this by having the joiner multicast the address:name mapping after joining, and by everyone sending their mapping to the newly joined member as well.
Note that this protocol is not strictly necessary; as {{IpAddressUUID}} addresses will also work without logical names mapped to them, but it improves legibility, e.g. of logs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3636) Improve monitoring of JMS pooled connection in JBoss CLI
by Jeff Mesnil (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jeff Mesnil commented on WFLY-3636:
-----------------------------------
[~will.tatam] yes, that's targeted for EAP 7.1.0 GA
> Improve monitoring of JMS pooled connection in JBoss CLI
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3636
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3636
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: JMS
> Affects Versions: 8.1.0.Final
> Environment: JBoss EAP 6.x
> Reporter: Tom Ross
> Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
> Fix For: 11.0.0.Alpha1
>
>
> At the moment there is no way of monitoring pooled JMS connections in JBoss CLI. It would be nice if there was some information available similar to what is available for JDBC pools:
> {noformat}
> "pool" => {
> "ActiveCount" => "0",
> "AvailableCount" => "0",
> "AverageBlockingTime" => "0",
> "AverageCreationTime" => "0",
> "CreatedCount" => "0",
> "DestroyedCount" => "0",
> "InUseCount" => "0",
> "MaxCreationTime" => "0",
> "MaxUsedCount" => "0",
> "MaxWaitCount" => "0",
> "MaxWaitTime" => "0",
> "TimedOut" => "0",
> "TotalBlockingTime" => "0",
> "TotalCreationTime" => "0",
> "statistics-enabled" => false
> }
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JASSIST-261) Issue with javassist on jdk 9b112
by Shigeru Chiba (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Shigeru Chiba commented on JASSIST-261:
---------------------------------------
I've just merged all the commits (bug fixes) to master into test/java9-jigsaw branch.
The only problem of test/java9-jigsaw is the code refers to a class available only in Java 9.
So maven build will fail if the compiler is not Java 9's.
I will release the head of master branch as release 3.21.0-GA and also test/java9-jigsaw branch
as maybe 3.22.0-CR1 (or 3.22.0-Java9-CR1 for clarification? Which naming scheme is appropriate?).
> Issue with javassist on jdk 9b112
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: JASSIST-261
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-261
> Project: Javassist
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.20.0-GA
> Environment: Javassist with jdk 9b112
> Reporter: Hoang Chuong Tran
> Assignee: Shigeru Chiba
>
> I am migrating a project to java 9, which also uses javassist to generate runtime code.
> One test of mine fails on jdk 9b112 while it passes on jdk 8u77.
> {noformat}
> import static javassist.CtClass.voidType;
> import java.lang.reflect.Method;
> import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
> import java.util.HashMap;
> import java.util.Map;
> import org.junit.Test;
> import javassist.ClassClassPath;
> import javassist.ClassPool;
> import javassist.CtClass;
> import javassist.CtField;
> import javassist.CtMethod;
> import javassist.CtNewMethod;
> public class MyTests {
> public static class MyObject {
> protected Object field;
> Object getField() {return field;}
> public void setField(Object field) {}
> }
> @Test
> public void test() throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException {
> Class<? extends MyObject> clazz = compile(MyObject.class);
> clazz.newInstance().setField(null);
> }
> /** Compile a transfer class */
> public static synchronized Class<? extends MyObject> compile(Class<?> targetClass) {
> // Determine class setters
> Map<String, Method> setters = extractSetters(targetClass);
> ClassPool classPool = ClassPool.getDefault();
> classPool.insertClassPath(new ClassClassPath(targetClass));
> try {
> // Compile a new transfer class on the fly
> CtClass baseClass = classPool.get(MyObject.class.getName());
> CtClass proxyClass = classPool.makeClass(targetClass.getName() + "_Modified", baseClass);
> for(Method originalSetter : setters.values()) {
> // Create a field to hold the attribute
> Class<?> fieldClass = originalSetter.getParameterTypes()[0];
> CtClass fieldType = classPool.get(fieldClass.getName());
> String fieldName = originalSetter.getName().substring(3);
> CtField field = new CtField(fieldType, fieldName, proxyClass);
> proxyClass.addField(field);
> // Create a setter method to set that field
> CtClass[] parameters = new CtClass[] { fieldType };
> String setterBody = "{ System.out.println(\"Hello World\"); }";
> CtMethod setter = CtNewMethod.make(voidType, originalSetter.getName(), parameters, new CtClass[0], setterBody, proxyClass);
> proxyClass.addMethod(setter);
> }
> Class<? extends MyObject> javaClass = proxyClass.toClass(targetClass.getClassLoader(), targetClass.getProtectionDomain());
> return javaClass;
> } catch(Exception e) {
> throw new RuntimeException("Failure during transfer compilation for " + targetClass, e);
> }
> }
> /** Extract setter methods from a class */
> public static Map<String, Method> extractSetters(Class<?> cls) {
> Map<String, Method> setters = new HashMap<String, Method>();
> for(Method method : cls.getMethods()) {
> // Lookup setter methods
> if(method.getName().startsWith("set")) {
> // Only public setters
> int modifiers = method.getModifiers();
> if(Modifier.isPublic(modifiers)) {
> Class<?>[] exceptions = method.getExceptionTypes();
> Class<?>[] parameters = method.getParameterTypes();
> Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
> if(exceptions.length <= 0 && parameters.length == 1 && "void".equals(returnType.getName())) {
> setters.put(method.getName(), method);
> }
> }
> }
> }
> return setters;
> }
> }
> {noformat}
> On jdk 8u77, the {{compile()}} function returns with success and "Hello world" is printed to the console.
> On jdk 9b112, I got the following exception
> {noformat}
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure during transfer compilation for class MyTests$MyObject
> at MyTests.compile(MyTests.java:68)
> at MyTests.test(MyTests.java:29)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(java.base@9-ea/Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(java.base@9-ea/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(java.base@9-ea/DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(java.base@9-ea/Method.java:531)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:86)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:459)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:670)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:382)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:192)
> Caused by: javassist.NotFoundException: java.lang.Object
> at javassist.ClassPool.get(ClassPool.java:450)
> at MyTests.compile(MyTests.java:51)
> ... 24 more
> {noformat}
> I suspect that is due to the jigsaw integration into the jdk.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 7 months