[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-311) Better error message if authentication is required to connect to the master but no realm is associated on the slave
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-311:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7
(was: 3.0.0.Alpha6)
> Better error message if authentication is required to connect to the master but no realm is associated on the slave
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-311
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-311
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Domain Management
> Environment: RH EL 6.3 - JBoss EAP 6.2
> Reporter: Riccardo Benvenuti
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7
>
>
> In JBoss 6.2 domain environment if in the host.xml file on the slave is missing the realm in the domain-controller tag as reported below
> <domain-controller>
> <remote host="10.123.137.200" port="9999"/>
> </domain-controller>
> we get the following error:
> JBoss Bootstrap Environment
> JBOSS_HOME: /opt/jboss7/jboss-eap-6.2
> JAVA: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_51/bin/java
> JAVA_OPTS: -Xms64m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Djboss.modules.system.pkgs=org.jboss.byteman -Djava.awt.headless=true
> =========================================================================
> 16:45:58,529 INFO [org.jboss.modules] (main) JBoss Modules version 1.3.0.Final-redhat-2
> 16:45:58,746 INFO [org.jboss.as.process.Host Controller.status] (main) JBAS012017: Starting process 'Host Controller'
> [Host Controller] 16:45:59,735 INFO [org.jboss.modules] (main) JBoss Modules version 1.3.0.Final-redhat-2
> [Host Controller] 16:45:59,913 INFO [org.jboss.msc] (main) JBoss MSC version 1.0.4.GA-redhat-1
> [Host Controller] 16:46:00,023 INFO [org.jboss.as] (MSC service thread 1-2) JBAS015899: JBoss EAP 6.2.0.GA (AS 7.3.0.Final-redhat-14) starting
> [Host Controller] 16:46:00,991 INFO [org.xnio] (MSC service thread 1-1) XNIO Version 3.0.7.GA-redhat-1
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,010 INFO [org.xnio.nio] (MSC service thread 1-1) XNIO NIO Implementation Version 3.0.7.GA-redhat-1
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,033 INFO [org.jboss.as] (Controller Boot Thread) JBAS010902: Creating http management service using network interface (management) port (9990) securePort (-1)
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,045 INFO [org.jboss.remoting] (MSC service thread 1-1) JBoss Remoting version 3.2.18.GA-redhat-1
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,173 INFO [org.jboss.as.remoting] (MSC service thread 1-1) JBAS017100: Listening on 10.123.137.201:9999
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,857 ERROR [org.jboss.remoting.remote.connection] (Remoting "testjb7s1:MANAGEMENT" read-1) JBREM000200: Remote connection failed: javax.security.sasl.SaslException: Authentication failed: all available authentication mechanisms failed
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,869 ERROR [org.jboss.as.host.controller] (Controller Boot Thread) JBAS010901: Could not connect to master. Aborting. Error was: java.lang.IllegalStateException: JBAS010942: Unable to connect due to authentication failure.
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,891 INFO [org.jboss.as.controller] (MSC service thread 1-2) JBAS014774: Service status report
> [Host Controller] JBAS014775: New missing/unsatisfied dependencies:
> [Host Controller] service jboss.server.controller.management.security_realm.ApplicationRealm.properties_authentication (missing) dependents: [service jboss.server.controller.management.security_realm.ApplicationRealm]
> [Host Controller]
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,897 INFO [org.jboss.as.controller] (MSC service thread 1-1) JBAS014774: Service status report
> [Host Controller] JBAS014775: New missing/unsatisfied dependencies:
> [Host Controller] service jboss.server.controller.management.security_realm.ManagementRealm (missing) dependents: [service jboss.remoting.authentication_provider.management]
> [Host Controller]
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,922 INFO [org.jboss.as.controller] (MSC service thread 1-2) JBAS014774: Service status report
> [Host Controller] JBAS014776: Newly corrected services:
> [Host Controller] service jboss.server.controller.management.security_realm.ApplicationRealm.properties_authentication (no longer required)
> [Host Controller] service jboss.server.controller.management.security_realm.ManagementRealm (no longer required)
> [Host Controller]
> [Host Controller] 16:46:01,927 INFO [org.jboss.as] (MSC service thread 1-2) JBAS015950: JBoss EAP 6.2.0.GA (AS 7.3.0.Final-redhat-14) stopped in 28ms
> 16:46:02,245 INFO [org.jboss.as.process.Host Controller.status] (reaper for Host Controller) JBAS012010: Process 'Host Controller' finished with an exit status of 99
> 16:46:02,247 INFO [org.jboss.as.process] (Thread-8) JBAS012016: Shutting down process controller
> 16:46:02,247 INFO [org.jboss.as.process] (Thread-8) JBAS012015: All processes finished; exiting
> Adding the realm everything works correctly
> <domain-controller>
> <remote host="10.123.137.200" port="9999" security-realm="ManagementRealm"/>
> </domain-controller>
> Maybe a warning message could be useful to find the problem.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-301) Configuration of individual contexts for http management interface.
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-301:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7
(was: 3.0.0.Alpha6)
> Configuration of individual contexts for http management interface.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-301
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-301
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Labels: affects_elytron
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7
>
>
> At the moment all management requests are handled over the '/management' context, we also have a '/console' context to serve up the files for the admin console.
> The '/management' context is secured using standard HTTP mechanisms, this decision was taken so that clients could be written in different languages and all they would need to know is how to use standard authentication mechanisms. Due to problems where web browsers could run malicious scripts cross origin resource sharing is completely disabled for this context.
> We need to start to open up the handling of cross origin requests for a couple of reasons: -
> - Enabling Keycloak SSO support.
> - Alternative console distribution options
> The '/management' context is going to be retained as-is for legacy clients, possibly even switched off by default.
> A new context can then be added using non-browser based authentication, this could be SSO Keycloak or could be a form of Digest authentication where the response is handled by the console and not the web browser - either way as the browser is bypassed it is no longer at risk of sending malicious cross origin requests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-234) Inconsistent synchronization in ConfigurationFile
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-234:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7
(was: 3.0.0.Alpha6)
> Inconsistent synchronization in ConfigurationFile
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-234
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-234
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha11
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7
>
>
> ConfigurationFile synchronizes on itself in some places and not in others. This may cause problems, particularly with the history dir.
> The one that comes to mind is successfulBoot is synchronized, but all the methods called by ConfigurationFilePersistenceResource are not. The latter is called with the controller lock held, but the former is not. So there's a possibility of two threads interacting with the files concurrently if an operation executes immediately after boot.
> The deployment scanner schedules such an op, so it's possible. Currently the schedule is for 200 ms after deployment-scanner add runs during boot.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-610) Integrate Elytron for management security.
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-610:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7
(was: 3.0.0.Alpha6)
> Integrate Elytron for management security.
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-610
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-610
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Domain Management, Security
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7
>
>
> This is a top level container task for the integration of Elytron for domain management security.
> Do note however that the purpose of Elytron is a single unified security solution across the whole of the application server so many tasks here will be groundwork for the remainder of the integration.
> At the moment the Elytron subsystem is being developed outside of wildfly-core, this will need to change in the future due to dependency issues (i.e. to write a subsystem you need to depend on core and core will need to include the subsystem (I think.)). However this will make it easier for now to ensure that the subsystem is 100% with no WildFly code accessing the subsystem - and also verify that we can create a distribtion with out the subsystem and still have a functional server.
> Overall if someone came up with an alternative subsystem that provided the same capabilities it should be possible to drop it in.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-406) Resource description for platform mbean properties that throw UnsupportedOperationException should say nillable="true"
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-406:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7
(was: 3.0.0.Alpha6)
> Resource description for platform mbean properties that throw UnsupportedOperationException should say nillable="true"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-406
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-406
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Environment: FreeBSD, OpenJDK 1.6
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7
>
>
> Some platform mbean getters are documented to throw a UOE on some VMs. The read-resource handler will catch the UOE and leave the attribute undefined, but the description says it's not nillable.
> Specifically, PlatformMBeanDescriptions.getThreadingResource()'s THREAD_CPU_TIME_ENABLED attribute, although there may well be others.
> This leads to this unit test failure on jvms where the UOE is thrown:
> failure message="thread-cpu-time-enabled is undefined"
> type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.fra mework.AssertionFailedError: thread-cpu-time-enabled is undefined
> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
> at
> org.jboss.as.platform.mbean.PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.validateResource(PlatformMBeanResourceUn
> itTestCase.java:595)
> at org.jboss.as.platform.mbean.PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.basicResourceTest(PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.java:563)
> at
> org.jboss.as.platform.mbean.PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.testThreadingMXBean(PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.java:340)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-710) Make ServerOperationResolver handle deployment-overlays similarly to deployments
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-710:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7
(was: 3.0.0.Alpha6)
> Make ServerOperationResolver handle deployment-overlays similarly to deployments
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-710
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-710
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0.Alpha2
> Reporter: Kabir Khan
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7
>
>
> Currently in domain mode a
> {code}
> /deployment-overlay=xxx:add(...)
> {code}
> results in a deployment overlay on ALL servers.
> However for deployments
> {code}
> /deployment=xxx:add(...)
> {code}
> does not get pushed to the servers. This happens when it is associated with a server group:
> {code}
> /server-group=zzz/deployment=xxx:add(...)
> {code}
> Similarly
> {code}
> /deployment-overlay=xxx:add(...)
> {code}
> should not get pushed to the servers, until we have a
> {code}
> /server-group=zzz/deployment=yyy:add(...)
> {code}
> which picks out the servers we want to have the overlay
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-673) Elytron Integration with Core
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-673:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7
(was: 3.0.0.Alpha6)
> Elytron Integration with Core
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-673
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-673
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7
>
>
> This is the top level tracking task for Elytron integration within core. The tasks for the changes actually being made will either be linked or added as sub-tasks.
> In addition to this general issues that affect the Elytron integration are being labelled with 'affects_elytron' and can be queried using the following query: -
> https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12323574
> The label is a general catch-all for issues that are of interest to us but are not automatically blockers for our progress.
> The general criteria for the resolution of this issue will be: -
> - Inclusion of the Elytron Subsystem in core
> - All network entry points in core to be securable using Elytron
> - All SSL artefacts to be obtainable from Elytron.
> Note: The legacy modes will become better defined as we progress but whilst it must be possible to use Elytron it's use may still be optional to a certain degree.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months