[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2492) Analysis right panel doesn't close after exiting guided decision table asset view
by Michael Anstis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis moved AF-1170 to DROOLS-2492:
--------------------------------------------
Project: Drools (was: AppFormer)
Key: DROOLS-2492 (was: AF-1170)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: classic default workflow)
Component/s: Guided Decision Table Editor
(was: appformer)
> Analysis right panel doesn't close after exiting guided decision table asset view
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2492
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2492
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Guided Decision Table Editor
> Reporter: Sree Hitha Gudimella
> Assignee: Toni Rikkola
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 10.35.20 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 10.35.34 AM.png
>
>
> Analysis panel that appears on the right while editing a guided decision table asset doesn't close by default after navigating to assets list view.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
6 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2263) GRAVE: JGRP000225: failed unmarshalling buffer into return value
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-2263:
--------------------------------
Then make it implement {{Streamable}} and implement {{writeTo()}} and {{readFrom()}}.
> GRAVE: JGRP000225: failed unmarshalling buffer into return value
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2263
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2263
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.11
> Environment: jdk1.8.0_66.jdk
> osx 10.10 & ubuntu 17.10
> Reporter: rama rama
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Attachments: SimpleChat.java
>
>
> trying to send a class that previous work with 3.x return
> "failed unmarshalling buffer into return value"
> jgroups instance it's configured with the default settings
> i create a test case to reproduce it, executing this class on my 2 boxes return
> ----
> GRAVE: JGRP000225: failed unmarshalling buffer into return value
> java.lang.InstantiationException: com.eg.util.comm.SimpleChat$EError
> at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:427)
> at org.jgroups.util.Util.readException(Util.java:899)
> at org.jgroups.util.Util.exceptionFromStream(Util.java:843)
> at org.jgroups.util.Util.exceptionFromStream(Util.java:831)
> at org.jgroups.util.Util.objectFromStream(Util.java:782)
> at org.jgroups.util.Util.objectFromStream(Util.java:742)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.replyFromBuffer(RequestCorrelator.java:463)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleResponse(RequestCorrelator.java:408)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:363)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessageBatch(RequestCorrelator.java:326)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:589)
> at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:837)
> at org.jgroups.stack.ProtocolStack.up(ProtocolStack.java:896)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:372)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.RSVP.up(RSVP.java:233)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:196)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:416)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:416)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:372)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:293)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.deliverBatch(UNICAST3.java:1024)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.removeAndDeliver(UNICAST3.java:833)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.handleBatchFromSelf(UNICAST3.java:520)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.up(UNICAST3.java:435)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2.up(NAKACK2.java:697)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.BARRIER.up(BARRIER.java:195)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:372)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_ALL.up(FD_ALL.java:212)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:372)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:372)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:372)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passBatchUp(TP.java:1274)
> at org.jgroups.util.MaxOneThreadPerSender$BatchHandlerLoop.passBatchUp(MaxOneThreadPerSender.java:284)
> at org.jgroups.util.SubmitToThreadPool$BatchHandler.run(SubmitToThreadPool.java:136)
> at org.jgroups.util.MaxOneThreadPerSender$BatchHandlerLoop.run(MaxOneThreadPerSender.java:273)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: com.eg.util.comm.SimpleChat$EError.<init>()
> at java.lang.Class.getConstructor0(Class.java:3082)
> at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:412)
> ... 37 more
> -----
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
6 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBJCA-1374) add option for disabling transaction_marked_rollback_only_fail_fast check that throws "javax.resource.ResourceException: IJ000459: Transaction is not active" error
by Scott Marlow (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Scott Marlow closed JBJCA-1374.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
never mind, just reading the IJ 1.2 doc and we should already have:
{quote}
"
4.1.2. Allow obtaining connections during MARKED_FOR_ROLLBACK
IronJacamar doesn't allow to obtain a new connection once a transaction is in
MARKED_FOR_ROLLBACK mode. This allows the container to fail eagerly, since any work after that point is wasted anyway.
However, certain applications depends on getting a connection to perform work.
IronJacamar has a system property called ironjacamar.allow_marked_for_rollback
which can be set to true to enable this scenario.
Note, that an existing enlisted connection is allowed to be obtained. This can be disallowed by
setting the system property
ironjacamar.allow_marked_for_rollback_fast_fail to true
{quote}
> add option for disabling transaction_marked_rollback_only_fail_fast check that throws "javax.resource.ResourceException: IJ000459: Transaction is not active" error
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBJCA-1374
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1374
> Project: IronJacamar
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Scott Marlow
>
> In my internal testing with Hibernate, I hit a problem with IronJacamar throwing "javax.resource.ResourceException: IJ000459: Transaction is not active" error when called to get a database connection from pool from a thread that has an active transaction marked for rollback only.
> The Hibernate jira is [https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-12472], which we are talking about changing. As well as WildFly jira [https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10229] for a related bug.
> Independent of the HHH-12472 + WFLY-10229 issues, I think it would be useful if there was a data source deployment option (in WildFly standalone*.xml) or system property, for disabling the IJ000459 check for rollback only transactions, as the IJ000459 check is not always expected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
6 years, 6 months