[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11670) Intermittent failures in EJBClientXidTransactionTestCase.testServerSuspension
by Yeray Borges (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Yeray Borges updated WFLY-11670:
--------------------------------
Description:
Test started failing fairly frequently on Jan 11:
https://ci.wildfly.org/project.html?projectId=WildFlyCore_PullRequest&bui...
https://ci.wildfly.org/project.html?projectId=WF&buildTypeId=&tab=testDet...
Perhaps that was related to https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/11913 which at a glance was the PR being tested in the first failure and may have been merged that day. So, [~yersan] I'm assigning to you to have a quick look.
I'll @Ignore the test.
For the record, this is the relevant error trace logged by the failed tests:
{noformat}
multinode.transaction.ClientEjb.testSameTransactionEachCall() throws java.rmi.RemoteException,javax.transaction.SystemException,javax.transaction.NotSupportedException,javax.naming.NamingException: javax.ejb.EJBException: EJBCLIENT000082: Cannot outflow the remote transaction "Local transaction (delegate=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff7f000101:-39b44114:5c59a6ad:10 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >, owner=Local transaction context for provider JBoss JTA transaction provider)" as its timeout elapsed
at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.EJBClientChannel.processInvocation(EJBClientChannel.java:471)
at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.RemoteEJBReceiver$1.lambda$handleDone$0(RemoteEJBReceiver.java:91)
at org.xnio.FinishedIoFuture.addNotifier(FinishedIoFuture.java:79)
at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.RemoteEJBReceiver$1.handleDone(RemoteEJBReceiver.java:76)
at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.RemoteEJBReceiver$1.handleDone(RemoteEJBReceiver.java:74)
at org.xnio.IoFuture$HandlingNotifier.notify(IoFuture.java:208)
at org.xnio.AbstractIoFuture$NotifierRunnable.run(AbstractIoFuture.java:720)
at org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl$TrackingExecutor.lambda$execute$0(EndpointImpl.java:949)
at org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1982)
at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1486)
at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1377)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: javax.transaction.SystemException: EJBCLIENT000082: Cannot outflow the remote transaction "Local transaction (delegate=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff7f000101:-39b44114:5c59a6ad:10 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >, owner=Local transaction context for provider JBoss JTA transaction provider)" as its timeout elapsed
at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.EJBClientChannel.writeTransaction(EJBClientChannel.java:581)
at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.EJBClientChannel.processInvocation(EJBClientChannel.java:367)
... 12 more
{noformat}
was:
Test started failing fairly frequently on Jan 11:
https://ci.wildfly.org/project.html?projectId=WildFlyCore_PullRequest&bui...
https://ci.wildfly.org/project.html?projectId=WF&buildTypeId=&tab=testDet...
Perhaps that was related to https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/11913 which at a glance was the PR being tested in the first failure and may have been merged that day. So, [~yersan] I'm assigning to you to have a quick look.
I'll @Ignore the test.
> Intermittent failures in EJBClientXidTransactionTestCase.testServerSuspension
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11670
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11670
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Yeray Borges
> Priority: Major
>
> Test started failing fairly frequently on Jan 11:
> https://ci.wildfly.org/project.html?projectId=WildFlyCore_PullRequest&bui...
> https://ci.wildfly.org/project.html?projectId=WF&buildTypeId=&tab=testDet...
> Perhaps that was related to https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/11913 which at a glance was the PR being tested in the first failure and may have been merged that day. So, [~yersan] I'm assigning to you to have a quick look.
> I'll @Ignore the test.
> For the record, this is the relevant error trace logged by the failed tests:
> {noformat}
> multinode.transaction.ClientEjb.testSameTransactionEachCall() throws java.rmi.RemoteException,javax.transaction.SystemException,javax.transaction.NotSupportedException,javax.naming.NamingException: javax.ejb.EJBException: EJBCLIENT000082: Cannot outflow the remote transaction "Local transaction (delegate=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff7f000101:-39b44114:5c59a6ad:10 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >, owner=Local transaction context for provider JBoss JTA transaction provider)" as its timeout elapsed
> at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.EJBClientChannel.processInvocation(EJBClientChannel.java:471)
> at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.RemoteEJBReceiver$1.lambda$handleDone$0(RemoteEJBReceiver.java:91)
> at org.xnio.FinishedIoFuture.addNotifier(FinishedIoFuture.java:79)
> at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.RemoteEJBReceiver$1.handleDone(RemoteEJBReceiver.java:76)
> at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.RemoteEJBReceiver$1.handleDone(RemoteEJBReceiver.java:74)
> at org.xnio.IoFuture$HandlingNotifier.notify(IoFuture.java:208)
> at org.xnio.AbstractIoFuture$NotifierRunnable.run(AbstractIoFuture.java:720)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl$TrackingExecutor.lambda$execute$0(EndpointImpl.java:949)
> at org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1982)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1486)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1377)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> Caused by: javax.transaction.SystemException: EJBCLIENT000082: Cannot outflow the remote transaction "Local transaction (delegate=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff7f000101:-39b44114:5c59a6ad:10 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >, owner=Local transaction context for provider JBoss JTA transaction provider)" as its timeout elapsed
> at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.EJBClientChannel.writeTransaction(EJBClientChannel.java:581)
> at org.jboss.ejb.protocol.remote.EJBClientChannel.processInvocation(EJBClientChannel.java:367)
> ... 12 more
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3606) From with modify fires unexpected rule
by Mario Fusco (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Mario Fusco updated DROOLS-3606:
--------------------------------
Sprint: 2019 Week 05-07
> From with modify fires unexpected rule
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3606
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3606
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.17.0.Final
> Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
>
> The rules below expect that only "R1" is fired when Person ("John", 20) is inserted. However, "R2" is also fired though age is set to 5 in modify block.
> {noformat}
> rule "R1"
> salience 1
> when
> $p : Person()
> Person( age > 10 ) from $p
> then
> modify ($p) {
> setAge(5);
> }
> System.out.println( "R1, " + $p);
> end
> rule "R2"
> salience 0
> when
> $p : Person()
> Person( age > 10 ) from $p
> then
> System.out.println( "R2, " + $p);
> end
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3606) From with modify fires unexpected rule
by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Toshiya Kobayashi updated DROOLS-3606:
--------------------------------------
Description:
The rules below expect that only "R1" is fired when Person ("John", 20) is inserted. However, "R2" is also fired though age is set to 5 in modify block.
{noformat}
rule "R1"
salience 1
when
$p : Person()
Person( age > 10 ) from $p
then
modify ($p) {
setAge(5);
}
System.out.println( "R1, " + $p);
end
rule "R2"
salience 0
when
$p : Person()
Person( age > 10 ) from $p
then
System.out.println( "R2, " + $p);
end
{noformat}
was:
The rules below expect that only "R1" is fired. However, "R2" is also fired though age is set to 5 in modify block.
{noformat}
rule "R1"
salience 1
when
$p : Person()
Person( age > 10 ) from $p
then
modify ($p) {
setAge(5);
}
System.out.println( "R1, " + $p);
end
rule "R2"
salience 0
when
$p : Person()
Person( age > 10 ) from $p
then
System.out.println( "R2, " + $p);
end
{noformat}
> From with modify fires unexpected rule
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3606
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3606
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.17.0.Final
> Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
>
> The rules below expect that only "R1" is fired when Person ("John", 20) is inserted. However, "R2" is also fired though age is set to 5 in modify block.
> {noformat}
> rule "R1"
> salience 1
> when
> $p : Person()
> Person( age > 10 ) from $p
> then
> modify ($p) {
> setAge(5);
> }
> System.out.println( "R1, " + $p);
> end
> rule "R2"
> salience 0
> when
> $p : Person()
> Person( age > 10 ) from $p
> then
> System.out.println( "R2, " + $p);
> end
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3606) From with modify fires unexpected rule
by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)
Toshiya Kobayashi created DROOLS-3606:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: From with modify fires unexpected rule
Key: DROOLS-3606
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3606
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core engine
Affects Versions: 7.17.0.Final
Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
Assignee: Mario Fusco
The rules below expect that only "R1" is fired. However, "R2" is also fired though age is set to 5 in modify block.
{noformat}
rule "R1"
salience 1
when
$p : Person()
Person( age > 10 ) from $p
then
modify ($p) {
setAge(5);
}
System.out.println( "R1, " + $p);
end
rule "R2"
salience 0
when
$p : Person()
Person( age > 10 ) from $p
then
System.out.println( "R2, " + $p);
end
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 8 months