December 2020 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[Red Hat JIRA] (ELY-2062) Unexpected order of security-manager permission checks on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11

by Marek Kopecky (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ELY-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Marek Kopecky commented on ELY-2062: ------------------------------------ The test itself pass if it [accept any ordering|https://github.com/marekkopecky/wildfly-elytron/commit/a1755b18c...], but I'm not sure whether this is correct. [~dlofthouse] you are the author of AlternateSecurityManagerTest, can you please check this issue? > Unexpected order of security-manager permission checks on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ELY-2062 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ELY-2062 > Project: WildFly Elytron > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Marek Kopecky > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Major > > [AlternateSecurityManagerTest|https://github.com/wildfly-security/wildfly-...] fails on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 because of unexpected order of security-manager permission checks. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (ELY-2062) Unexpected order of security-manager permission checks on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11

by Marek Kopecky (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ELY-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Marek Kopecky updated ELY-2062: ------------------------------- Description: [AlternateSecurityManagerTest|https://github.com/wildfly-security/wildfly-...] fails on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 because of unexpected order of security-manager permission checks. (was: [AlternateSecurityManagerTest|https://github.com/wildfly-security/wildfly-...] fails on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 because of unexpected order of security-manager permission checks. The test itself can be fixed by accepting different order, but we need to be sure that it's excepted.) > Unexpected order of security-manager permission checks on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ELY-2062 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ELY-2062 > Project: WildFly Elytron > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Marek Kopecky > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Major > > [AlternateSecurityManagerTest|https://github.com/wildfly-security/wildfly-...] fails on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 because of unexpected order of security-manager permission checks. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (ELY-2062) Unexpected order of security-manager permission checks on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11

by Marek Kopecky (Jira)

Marek Kopecky created ELY-2062: ---------------------------------- Summary: Unexpected order of security-manager permission checks on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 Key: ELY-2062 URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ELY-2062 Project: WildFly Elytron Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Marek Kopecky Assignee: Darran Lofthouse [AlternateSecurityManagerTest|https://github.com/wildfly-security/wildfly-...] fails on Eclipse OpenJ9 VM AdoptOpenJDK 11 because of unexpected order of security-manager permission checks. The test itself can be fixed by accepting different order, but we need to be sure that it's excepted. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-5913) [DMN Designer] Improving UX when Decision Table is relying on not updated data.

by Donato Marrazzo (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Donato Marrazzo commented on DROOLS-5913: ----------------------------------------- I believe that this use case would be almost address when this issue will be addressed: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/BAPL-1562 In fact, the key aspect is that the decision table headers (input and output expressions) are FEEL expressions. When users add a new column, they will get intellisense suggestions to set correctly the expression to variable field (e.g. "Vehicle.field"). Regarding the second issue, I believe that it can be addressed by a proper FEEL expression validation that underlines the wrong expression. Maybe the final resolution would be a complex refactoring feature that is able to keep references between the Data Models and their usage in the FEEL expressions. > [DMN Designer] Improving UX when Decision Table is relying on not updated data. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5913 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5913 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Yeser Amer > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Major > > We should find a way to improve User Experience in the case a Decision Table is relying on Data Type which was modified by the user. > Original Message: > {noformat} > TL;DR a modification of an Object (aka Structure) in the Data Model does not get reflected in the DMN Model. > Maybe someone can point out the error in the following scenario. > (1) Using the DMN editor in BC RHPAM.7.9 I defined the "Ve" Object (aka Structure) and the "Ve_data1" simple variable in the Data Model as custom data types > (2) "Ve", named as "Vehicle", was used as data input to a DMN model and a decision was defined backed by a decision table > (3) when the decision table was first created the columns for the "Vehicle" attributes were created as individual columns. > (4) Modified the "Ve" structure by removing some attributes > (5) The deleted attributes are still available in the decision table. > I have two issues in this scenario. > (I1) Step (3). By creating the columns as individual columns of the "Vehicle" variable in the decision table any sense between them belonging to the "Ve" structure is lost. Furthermore the decision table allows for changing the data type of the columns despite the fact that these belong(?) to the "Ve" object. > (I2) Step (5). I was expecting that by modifying the columns in the data structure that change would be visible in the decision table as well. Yes, a warning is generated, but it is cryptic, lost in a table full of equally cryptic messages and no visual indication of the actual problem in the decision table. I can check the messages and find out what is going on, but explaining this to my customer proved to be quite a challenge. > We are still targeting DMN to business analysts I presume. > {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-5864) Mark kie-pmml legacy as deprecated

by Daniele Zonca (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Daniele Zonca updated DROOLS-5864: ---------------------------------- Summary: Mark kie-pmml legacy as deprecated (was: Mark kie-pmml legacy as deprecated and document how to re-enable it) > Mark kie-pmml legacy as deprecated > ---------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5864 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5864 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Gabriele Cardosi > Assignee: Gabriele Cardosi > Priority: Major > Labels: TrustyAI > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-4582) Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column

by Marek Novotny (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Marek Novotny updated DROOLS-4582: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 7.48.0.Final) > Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4582 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing > Reporter: Anna Dupliak > Assignee: Yeser Amer > Priority: Minor > Labels: CustomerFocus, drools-tools > Attachments: image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png, span.webm > > > !image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png|thumbnail! > Selection doesn't span entirely if you bind new column -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-4582) Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column

by Marek Novotny (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Marek Novotny reopened DROOLS-4582: ----------------------------------- > Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4582 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing > Reporter: Anna Dupliak > Assignee: Yeser Amer > Priority: Minor > Labels: CustomerFocus, drools-tools > Fix For: 7.48.0.Final > > Attachments: image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png, span.webm > > > !image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png|thumbnail! > Selection doesn't span entirely if you bind new column -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-5913) [DMN Designer] Improving UX when Decision Table is relying on not updated data.

by Yeser Amer (Jira)

Yeser Amer created DROOLS-5913: ---------------------------------- Summary: [DMN Designer] Improving UX when Decision Table is relying on not updated data. Key: DROOLS-5913 URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5913 Project: Drools Issue Type: Enhancement Reporter: Yeser Amer Assignee: Guilherme Gomes We should find a way to improve User Experience in the case a Decision Table is relying on Data Type which was modified by the user. Original Message: {noformat} TL;DR a modification of an Object (aka Structure) in the Data Model does not get reflected in the DMN Model. Maybe someone can point out the error in the following scenario. (1) Using the DMN editor in BC RHPAM.7.9 I defined the "Ve" Object (aka Structure) and the "Ve_data1" simple variable in the Data Model as custom data types (2) "Ve", named as "Vehicle", was used as data input to a DMN model and a decision was defined backed by a decision table (3) when the decision table was first created the columns for the "Vehicle" attributes were created as individual columns. (4) Modified the "Ve" structure by removing some attributes (5) The deleted attributes are still available in the decision table. I have two issues in this scenario. (I1) Step (3). By creating the columns as individual columns of the "Vehicle" variable in the decision table any sense between them belonging to the "Ve" structure is lost. Furthermore the decision table allows for changing the data type of the columns despite the fact that these belong(?) to the "Ve" object. (I2) Step (5). I was expecting that by modifying the columns in the data structure that change would be visible in the decision table as well. Yes, a warning is generated, but it is cryptic, lost in a table full of equally cryptic messages and no visual indication of the actual problem in the decision table. I can check the messages and find out what is going on, but explaining this to my customer proved to be quite a challenge. We are still targeting DMN to business analysts I presume. {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-4582) Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column

by Yeser Amer (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Yeser Amer resolved DROOLS-4582. -------------------------------- Resolution: Done > Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4582 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing > Reporter: Anna Dupliak > Assignee: Yeser Amer > Priority: Minor > Labels: CustomerFocus, drools-tools > Fix For: 7.48.0.Final > > Attachments: image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png, span.webm > > > !image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png|thumbnail! > Selection doesn't span entirely if you bind new column -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-4582) Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column

by Yeser Amer (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Yeser Amer updated DROOLS-4582: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 7.48.0.Final > Cell selection doesn't span the entire cell if you Insert RightMost Column > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-4582 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-4582 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing > Reporter: Anna Dupliak > Assignee: Yeser Amer > Priority: Minor > Labels: CustomerFocus, drools-tools > Fix For: 7.48.0.Final > > Attachments: image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png, span.webm > > > !image-2019-10-01-10-50-42-411.png|thumbnail! > Selection doesn't span entirely if you bind new column -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

3 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira December 2020