[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-13840) Problematic Language usage deprecation and replacement
by Cheng Fang (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-13840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Cheng Fang updated WFLY-13840:
------------------------------
Description:
The engineering performed preliminary analysis as per the guidance and then identified the following areas related to ejb to be replaced:
blacklist in wildfly-naming-client repo (impact 1, maybe 2)
blacklist in jboss-ejb-client (impact 1, 2)
use of blacklist, whitelist, slave in ejb3 subsystem
was:
The engineering performed preliminary analysis as per the guidance [1] and then identified the following areas related to ejb to be replaced:
blacklist in wildfly-naming-client repo (impact 1, maybe 2)
blacklist in jboss-ejb-client (impact 1, 2)
use of blacklist, whitelist, slave in ejb3 subsystem
[1]https://docs.google.com/document/d/19KSYtmOKK9KQ0qHN6Ix338CrzcWbdQPZ1FI...
> Problematic Language usage deprecation and replacement
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-13840
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-13840
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 20.0.1.Final
> Reporter: Cheng Fang
> Assignee: Cheng Fang
> Priority: Major
>
> The engineering performed preliminary analysis as per the guidance and then identified the following areas related to ejb to be replaced:
> blacklist in wildfly-naming-client repo (impact 1, maybe 2)
> blacklist in jboss-ejb-client (impact 1, 2)
> use of blacklist, whitelist, slave in ejb3 subsystem
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
4 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-13848) Add a new security-plugins module
by Darran Lofthouse (Jira)
Darran Lofthouse created WFLY-13848:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Add a new security-plugins module
Key: WFLY-13848
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-13848
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: Security
Affects Versions: 20.0.1.Final
Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
Fix For: 21.0.0.Beta1
The package "org.jboss.as.security.plugins" needs to be split out as the web services subsystem has a dependency on the legacy security subsystem module just to access this - if we split this out then webservices will not pull in the security subsystem module with it's layer.
The new module should be marked as private
This new module will also need to contain the "org.jboss.as.security.lru" package.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
4 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2501) Jgroup view not stabilized after upgrading from 3.4.3 to 4.0.10
by Ajay Sharma (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JGRP-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Ajay Sharma updated JGRP-2501:
------------------------------
Summary: Jgroup view not stabilized after upgrading from 3.4.3 to 4.0.10 (was: Jgroup view not stabilized after upgrading from 3.4.3 to 4.01.0)
> Jgroup view not stabilized after upgrading from 3.4.3 to 4.0.10
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2501
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JGRP-2501
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.0.10
> Reporter: Ajay Sharma
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Major
>
> Hi
> we have 15 node cluster after upgrading Jgroup from 3.4.3 to 4.0.10, system is unstable and keep getting below logs
> 2020-09-03 11:47:30.317 WARN org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS - vmc0198-27827: not member of view [vmc0208-48939|123]; discarding it
> 2020-09-03 11:47:32.316 WARN org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS - vmc0198-27827: failed to create view from delta-view; dropping view: java.lang.IllegalStateException: the view-id of the delta view ([vmc0208-48939|123]) doesn't match the current view-id ([vmc0208-48939|122]); discarding delta view [vmc0208-48939|124], ref-view=[vmc0208-48939|123], joined=[vmc0198-5504]
> 2020-09-03 11:47:32.323 WARN org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS - vmc0198-27827: not member of view [vmc0208-48939|124]; discarding it.
> 2020-09-03 11:49:07.160 WARN org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2 - JGRP000011: vmc0198-63871: dropped message batch from non-member vmc0201-28703 (view=MergeView::[vmc0208-48939|140] (24) [ ***REMOVING MACHINE NAME AND PORT ***] ])
> 2020-09-03 11:49:07.160 WARN org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2 - JGRP000011: vmc0198-23411: dropped message batch from non-member vmc0201-28703 (view=[***REMOVING MACHINE NAME AND PORT FOR CLEAR VIEW ***] .])
> 2020-09-05 16:16:07.380 DEBUG org.jgroups.protocols.FD_ALL - haven't received a heartbeat from vmc0201-55458 for 12541 ms, adding it to suspect list
> 2020-09-05 16:16:07.535 DEBUG org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK - vmc0198-24881: failed connecting to vmc0204-45403: connect timed out
> 2020-09-05 16:16:07.536 DEBUG org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK - vmc0198-24881: broadcasting suspect(vmc0204-45403)
> 2020-09-05 16:16:07.536 DEBUG org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK - vmc0198-24881: pingable_mbrs=[***REMOVING MACHINE NAME AND PORT ***], ping_dest=vmc0204-54485
> 2020-09-05 16:16:08.513 DEBUG org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS - vmc0198-52842: installing view [ ***REMOVING MACHINE NAME AND PORT FOR CLEAR VIEW *** ]
> 2020-09-05 16:16:08.513 DEBUG org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS - vmc0198-24881: installing view [vmc0200-30543|2672] (184) [ ***REMOVING MACHINE NAME AND PORT FOR CLEAR VIEW *** ]
> ===================================
> To isolate the issue we have created a small program both in Jgroup 3.4.3 and Jgroups 4.0.10
> Both applications take IP addresses and the number of channels as arguments. We have run both applications in the following matrix and collected view data and timings.
> Below are the stats:
> Number of members (number of nodes x number of channels) Jgroups 3.4.3 Jgroup 4.0.10
> 225 (15x15) Simultaneous start 25 - 30 seconds* 15 minutes**
> 225 (15x15) Rolling start (view after 15th node start) 20 seconds* 10 minutes**
> 196 (14x14) Simultaneous start 25 seconds* 4 minutes**
> 169 (13x13) Simultaneous start 30 - 31 seconds* 7 minutes**
> 144 (12x12) Simultaneous start 27 seconds* 5 minutes**
> 121 (11x11) Simultaneous start 22 seconds* 2 minutes**
> 100 (10x10) Simultaneous start 20 seconds* 5 minutes**
> ...
> ...
> 9 to 49 channels (3x3) to (7x7) almost immediate* almost immediate*
> Note: Even after taking 15 minutes, views are not stable its keeps fluctuating.
> =======
> Below are my protocols used with properties:
> Protocol[] protocolStack={
> new UDP().setValue("bind_addr",InetAddress.getByName(myBindAddress)).setValue("mcast_port", 10600).setValue("bind_port", 10601)
> .setValue("port_range", 100).setValue("diagnostics_bind_interfaces", parInterfaceList).setValue("diagnostics_port", 10599),
> new PING(),
> new MERGE3(),
> new FD_SOCK().setValue("bind_addr", InetAddress.getByName(myBindAddress)),
> new FD_ALL().setValue("timeout", 12000).setValue("interval", 3000),
> new VERIFY_SUSPECT().setValue("bind_addr", InetAddress.getByName(myBindAddress)),
> new BARRIER(),
> new NAKACK2(),
> new UNICAST3(),
> new STABLE(),
> new GMS().setValue("print_local_addr", true),
> new UFC(),
> new MFC(),
> new FRAG2()};
> However, we tried to update below few properties value but no luck
> thread_pool_max_threads = 200 in UDP()
> Default values of FD_ALL()
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
4 years, 3 months