ConnectionTable: spurious Connection instances on concurrent connects
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-549
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-549
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assigned To: Bela Ban
Fix For: 2.6
If we have members A and B, and they don't yet have connections to each other, and
start sending messages to each other at the exact same time, then we run into the
following scenario:
- A attempts to connect to B (new Socket())
- B attempts to connect to A
- A accepts B's connection and adds an entry for B into its table
- B adds an entry for A into its table
- B gets the accept() from A, but doesn't add the new Connection into its table
because there is already a Connection. This leads to a spurious Connection object, which
will only be closed and garbage collected once A or B leaves the cluster
- We used to close Connections which were already in the table, but this lead to ping-pong
effects where concurrent initial senders always closed each others connections
- Even worse: a new Socket() always creates a new Connection object and places it into the
table, *regardless* of whether a Connection for a given destination already exists or not
!
GOAL:
#1 Have only 1 TCP connection between any 2 members
#2 Establish a handshaking mechanism, to avoid spurious connections
SOLUTION:
- When A establishes a connection to B, A needs to get agreement from B first (and vice
versa)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira