[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBBUILD-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl...
]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBBUILD-534:
---------------------------------------------
yes - exactly, its not really solvable if product binaries are considered different.
Then the dependency set will have to be different for both project and product builds
which will lead to horrible maintanence headache ;(
Maven repository aggregation
----------------------------
Key: JBBUILD-534
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBBUILD-534
Project: JBoss Build System
Issue Type: Task
Components: Maven Builds
Reporter: Thomas Diesler
There are a number of projects which have dependencies on non-jboss
maven repos (jboss-osgi is one of them)
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4235779#...
I believe, this issue is general enough to have proper repo aggregation
setup somehow
Here is a link to some aggregators
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Maven+Repository+Manager+Featu...
Is this a way you want to move forward or should we stick with manually copying
individual artefacts to the jboss repo?
Please note, that by doing so (i.e. mvn deploy-file) you loose the original pom and hence
the information on transitive dependencies.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-deploy-plugin/deploy-file-mojo.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira