]
Richard Achmatowicz commented on JGRP-549:
------------------------------------------
Done.
ConnectionTable: spurious Connection instances on concurrent
connects
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-549
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-549
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 2.4.7, 2.6
If we have members A and B, and they don't yet have connections to each other, and
start sending messages to each other at the exact same time, then we run into the
following scenario:
- A attempts to connect to B (new Socket())
- B attempts to connect to A
- A accepts B's connection and adds an entry for B into its table
- B adds an entry for A into its table
- B gets the accept() from A, but doesn't add the new Connection into its table
because there is already a Connection. This leads to a spurious Connection object, which
will only be closed and garbage collected once A or B leaves the cluster
- We used to close Connections which were already in the table, but this lead to
ping-pong effects where concurrent initial senders always closed each others connections
- Even worse: a new Socket() always creates a new Connection object and places it into
the table, *regardless* of whether a Connection for a given destination already exists or
not !
GOAL:
#1 Have only 1 TCP connection between any 2 members
#2 Establish a handshaking mechanism, to avoid spurious connections
SOLUTION:
- When A establishes a connection to B, A needs to get agreement from B first (and vice
versa)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: