]
Brian Stansberry commented on AS7-2189:
---------------------------------------
[3:57pm] bstansberry: most important is we need descriptions and write-attribute
[3:57pm] bstansberry: everything else is secondary
[3:57pm] rachmatowicz: clarify please
[3:58pm] bstansberry we need read-resource-description to provide a full description
[3:58pm] bstansberry:
[3:58pm] bstansberry: last comment shows what we provide now -- basically nothing
[3:59pm] bstansberry: and, we need write-attribute for every attribute
[3:59pm] bstansberry: even if it just uses ReloadRequiredWriteAttributeHandler
[3:59pm] bstansberry: users should never have to edit xml to change config
[3:59pm] bstansberry: those two things are far more important than any things like complex
attribute vs. fake resource
Revisit the jgroups management configuration
--------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-2189
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-2189
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Domain Management
Reporter: Heiko Braun
Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
Fix For: 7.1.0.Final
This doesn't look very reasonable to me:
{noformat}
[domain@localhost:9999 /] /profile=ha/subsystem=jgroups/stack=tcp:read-resource
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => {
"protocol" => [
{
"type" => "MPING",
"socket-binding" => "jgroups-mping"
},
{"type" => "MERGE2"},
{
"type" => "FD_SOCK",
"socket-binding" => "jgroups-tcp-fd"
},
{"type" => "FD"},
{"type" => "VERIFY_SUSPECT"},
{"type" => "BARRIER"},
{"type" => "pbcast.NAKACK"},
{"type" => "UNICAST"},
{"type" => "pbcast.STABLE"},
{"type" => "VIEW_SYNC"},
{"type" => "pbcast.GMS"},
{"type" => "UFC"},
{"type" => "MFC"},
{"type" => "FRAG2"},
{"type" => "pbcast.STREAMING_STATE_TRANSFER"},
{"type" => "pbcast.FLUSH"}
],
"transport" => {
"type" => "TCP",
"socket-binding" => "jgroups-tcp",
"diagnostics-socket-binding" => "jgroups-diagnostics"
}
}
}
{noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: