]
Ben Wang updated JBCACHE-695:
-----------------------------
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
PojoCache transaction context has limitation for in-memory rollbakck
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBCACHE-695
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-695
Project: JBoss Cache
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: PojoCache
Reporter: Ben Wang
Assigned To: Ben Wang
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 2.0.0
Currently PojoCache supports transaction rollback. For instance,
cache.attach(id, pojo);
is transactional even if there is no user transaction. However, with user transaction,
tx.begin();
cache.attach(id, pojo);
pojo.setAge(20);
tx.rollback();
the replication is rollbacked but the in-memory copy is not, e.g., pojo.getAge() == 20.
There is a workaround if you are using transaction by yourself:
// Just make sure this one succeeds first.
tx.begin();
cache.attach(id, pojo);
tx.commit();
// All subsquent field update will be transactional then.
tx.begin();
pojo.setAge(20);
tx.rollback();
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: