[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
István Tóth commented on WFLY-8431:
-----------------------------------
Actually, I had two PRs in this ticket.
the fix for the more critical JBossAuthConfigFactory synchronization bug (at least this
the bug that directly hits my code) is still not merged.
https://github.com/jboss/jboss-jaspi-api_spec/pull/4
Would you like me to update the PR to the trunk version?
Race conditions in JASPIC registration code
-------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-8431
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8431
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Security
Affects Versions: 10.1.0.Final
Environment: Centos 7 x86_64, with the included Java 8 environment
Reporter: István Tóth
Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
Priority: Major
Attachments: GetFactoryTestCase.java
javax.security.auth.message.config.AuthConfigFactory and
org.jboss.security.auth.message.config.JBossAuthConfigFactory
have race conditions.
1. javax.security.auth.message.config.AuthConfigFactory#getFactory() has a race
condition. The checking and creation of the _factory object is not atomic.
I think the best and simplest solution would be to simply make the getFactory() method
synchronized. (The same method in the Glassfish implmentation is synchronized)
2. The keyTo*Map fields of the
org.jboss.security.auth.message.config.JBossAuthConfigFactory are not thread safe.
Nearly all methods of this class manipulate these, without any synchronization.
In this case I believe that changing those from HashMaps to ConcurrentHashMaps should be
enough to avoid the worst of the races, while incurring a negligible performance penalty.
The methods that modify the maps should also be made synchronized, or rewritten to use
the
atomic ConcurrentHashMaps operations.
A possible workaround is to add a synchronized(AuthConfigFactory.class) block around the
JASPIC initialization code, where the JBossAuthConfigFactory methods are called. Of course
this only works if every webapp on the server can be modified this way.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)