[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Richard Achmatowicz commented on WFLY-5822:
-------------------------------------------
To check the distribution of created sessions, did a quick find for "new SFSB
created" in the log of each process:
||Perf Node||Sessions created||
|perf17|0|
|perf18|1418|
|perf19|1460|
|perf20|1422|
|perf21|1444|
|perf22|0|
|perf23|0|
|perf24|0|
|perf25|0|
|perf26|0|
I assume that perf18-21 are server nodes on which sessions will be created.
Clustering performance regression in ejbremote-dist-sync scenario
------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-5822
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5822
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Clustering, EJB
Affects Versions: 10.0.0.CR5
Reporter: Michal Vinkler
Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
Compared to EAP 6, all SYNC scenarios have the same/better performance except of this
one, wonder why?
Compare these results:
stress-ejbremote-dist-sync
7.0.0.ER2:
[
throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
6.4.0.GA:
[
throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
---------------------------------------
Just for comparison: ejbremote REPL_SYNC scenario *performs well* on the other hand:
stress-ejbremote-repl-sync
7.0.0.ER2:
[
throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
6.4.0.GA:
[
throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)