[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBDEPLOY-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Ales Justin updated JBDEPLOY-233:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: JBDEPLOY-2.2.x
(was: JBDEPLOY-2.0.9.GA)
(was: JBDEPLOY-2.2.0.Alpha1)
Affects Version/s: JBDEPLOY-2.0.10.GA
JBDEPLOY-2.2.0.Alpha1
(was: JBDEPLOY-2.0.8.SP1)
Let's break relative order or deployer name ordering backward
compatibility
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBDEPLOY-233
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBDEPLOY-233
Project: JBoss Deployers
Issue Type: Feature Request
Affects Versions: JBDEPLOY-2.0.10.GA , JBDEPLOY-2.2.0.Alpha1
Reporter: Richard Opalka
Fix For: JBDEPLOY-2.2.x
Attachments: issue.patch
There is a requirement to implement deployers comparison if they are
"equivalent".
This requirement is because of BC and should be removed ASAP IMHO.
Here are the top two reasons why it should be removed:
* it breaks topological ordering algorithm linear complexity
* deployers should define their order using inputs/outputs only and shouldn't rely
on relative order or deployer name ordering
I suggest to remove this ordering from our algorithms and then fix particular deployers
in AS trunk, that would fail because of wrong ordering.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira