6:32 a.m.
Lukas Stampf created JBRULES-3616:
-------------------------------------
Summary: ConcurrentModificationException in AbstractRuleBase.removePackage
Key: JBRULES-3616
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 5.4.0.Final, 5.5.0.Beta1
Reporter: Lukas Stampf
Assignee: Mark Proctor
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
//and now the rule flows
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationError at iter.next().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
6:32 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Lukas Stampf updated JBRULES-3616:
----------------------------------
Description:
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
//and now the rule flows
{code}
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
{code}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
{code}
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
{code}
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationError at iter.next().
was:
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
//and now the rule flows
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationError at iter.next().
ConcurrentModificationException in AbstractRuleBase.removePackage
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-3616
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 5.4.0.Final, 5.5.0.Beta1
Reporter: Lukas Stampf
Assignee: Mark Proctor
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
//and now the rule flows
{code}
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
{code}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
{code}
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
{code}
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationError at iter.next().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
6:36 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Lukas Stampf updated JBRULES-3616:
----------------------------------
Description:
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
{code}
//and now the rule flows
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
{code}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
{code}
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
{code}
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationException at iter.next().
was:
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
//and now the rule flows
{code}
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
{code}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
{code}
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
{code}
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationError at iter.next().
ConcurrentModificationException in AbstractRuleBase.removePackage
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-3616
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 5.4.0.Final, 5.5.0.Beta1
Reporter: Lukas Stampf
Assignee: Mark Proctor
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
{code}
//and now the rule flows
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
{code}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
{code}
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
{code}
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationException at iter.next().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3:26 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Mario Fusco reassigned JBRULES-3616:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Mario Fusco (was: Mark Proctor)
ConcurrentModificationException in AbstractRuleBase.removePackage
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-3616
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 5.4.0.Final, 5.5.0.Beta1
Reporter: Lukas Stampf
Assignee: Mario Fusco
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
{code}
//and now the rule flows
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
{code}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
{code}
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
{code}
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationException at iter.next().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
4:42 a.m.
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Mario Fusco resolved JBRULES-3616.
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.5.0.Beta1
Resolution: Done
ConcurrentModificationException in AbstractRuleBase.removePackage
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-3616
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3616
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 5.4.0.Final, 5.5.0.Beta1
Reporter: Lukas Stampf
Assignee: Mario Fusco
Fix For: 5.5.0.Beta1
At AbstractRuleBase.removePackage:
{code}
//and now the rule flows
final Map flows = pkg.getRuleFlows();
for (final Iterator iter = flows.keySet().iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
removeProcess( (String) iter.next() );
}
{code}
At AbstractRuleBase.removeProcess
{code}
this.pkgs.get(process.getPackageName()).removeRuleFlow(id);
{code}
removeProcess removes an object from the Map referenced by the flows variable in
removePackage. Since the iterator is based on this variable it leads to a
ConcurrentModificationException at iter.next().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
4312
days inactive
4320
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Lukas Stampf (JIRA) -
Mario Fusco (JIRA)