[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nathalie ravenel updated DROOLS-610: ------------------------------------ Attachment: image001.jpg I will try this solution. In fact the function modifier_element can be called inside a rule. I understand the problem. Thanks you for the time dedicated. I will inform about the tests De : Mario Fusco (JIRA) [mailto:issues@jboss.org] Envoyé : jeudi 25 septembre 2014 09:29 À : RAVENEL Nathalie 161957 Objet : [JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-610) drools-worker-2 thread blocked and the main program blocks [Image supprimée par l'expéditeur.] Mario Fusco<https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=mfusco> commented on [Bug] DROOLS-610<https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-610> Re: drools-worker-2 thread blocked and the main program blocks<https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-610> It's hard to tell just looking at that method and missing the big picture. If you want to keep using that method as it is from both your code and from inside a rule consequence I suggest to add a boolean to its list of arguments more or less as it follows: public void modifier_element(String nom_slot, String valeur, boolean inConsequence) { // do stuff if (!inConsequence) { this.session.fireAllRules(); } // do other stuff } and invoke that method passing true when you call it from a consequence and false when you call it from your code. Makes sense? [Add Comment]<https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-610#add-comment> Add Comment<https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-610#add-comment> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329-sha1:7df76f1) [Atlassian logo] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)