[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Michael Musgrove updated WFLY-6442:
-----------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: The fix will be in 5.3.2.Final which is due for release tomorrow after which I will
raise a PR to get it into WildFly.)
Inconsistent behavior of journal object store for heuristic state
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-6442
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6442
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Transactions
Reporter: Ondřej Chaloupka
Assignee: Michael Musgrove
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 10.1.0.Final
We do experience inconsistent behavior of journal object store (amq) against shadow
store. This starts to happen from EAP7/Narayana 5.2.14.Final.
Our test case:
* enlist activemq JMS resource
* enlist test XA resource
* prepare JMS resource
* prepare test XA resource
* commit JMS resource
* commit test XA resource
** byteman force {{topLevelCommit}} to return {{XAException.XA_HEURRB}}
2PC result for XA resource is {{TwoPhaseOutcome.HEURISTIC_HAZARD}} and client gets
{{javax.transaction.HeuristicMixedException}}
* probing log and showing state of transactions
{{/subsystem=transactions/log-store=log-store:probe}}
** expecting one indoubt participant in HEURISTIC state
* calling operation {{recovery}} on all transaction's participants
* do recovery
This works fine when Shadow log store or jdbc object store is used. For AMQ object log
store the participant is first not in HEURISTIC state but is in state PREPARED. And second
there is not only one participant of transaction in-doubt but they're returned two
participants.
Then during recovery process the periodic recovery also can see two participants for
recovery (that's my feeling from log). Not only one as expected as first resource was
already correctly committed (that's how shadow log store works).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)