[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-611?page=all ]
Tom Baeyens closed JBPM-611.
----------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
i evaluated and didn't opt for quartz. integrating it into jBPM was too hard. mainly
the db connection management would be really hacky to get quartz to use the same jdbc
connection as jBPM. That is what we needed to run fine in a standard environment.
also the extra indirection layer between quartz and jBPM would have added extra
unnecessary complexity.
i did get inspired by reading their code and i have developed a unified job scheduler that
is used for both asynchronous messaging and timers in jbpm. there's also a completely
new locking mechanism.
replace scheduler and timer service implementations with quartz
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBPM-611
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-611
Project: JBoss jBPM
Issue Type: Task
Components: Core Engine
Reporter: Tom Baeyens
Assigned To: Tom Baeyens
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira