[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-198?page=comments#action_12345242 ]
Mark Little commented on JBESB-198:
-----------------------------------
I suggest pushing this back to 4.1. The same effect can be had now with the DB
implementation by requiring that every individual store share the same backend database.
In reality that is the kind of deployment people will use and it is more efficient because
you're letting the database handle any remote communication.
RMI interface for persistence store service
-------------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-198
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-198
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Reporter: Daniel Brum
Assigned To: Daniel Brum
Fix For: 4.0
Add an RMI interface to access the persistence store engine - we need this so that each
jvm does not have it's own set of DB connections from the factory.
This is the same approach taken by the Service Registry
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira