On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:16:46 +0100, Rob Stryker <rob.stryker(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Sometimes the results is not expanded. Sometime typing the same
query
> gives different
> result (looks like the previous filter affects the new result ?)
Yes the "refinement" of an already-typed query string uses different
code than pasting one in. This is to help with efficiency but obviously
some code differences remain. I've made a few commits to try to make the
results be the same. They're *supposed* to be the same.
Why is the code different ? If the previous search is not the start of the
next one
shouldn't it not just be the exact same ?
>> I see 2 options there:
>> #1 - keep the tree as it is and filters only on the visible parts of
>> the ObjectNames (i.e. the domain & the properties' values)
>
> I think this makes sense.
>
This is how I intend to keep it.
keep it ? It isn't like this yet - is it ?
--
/max