To be clear, it's only the stuff in our SVN repo [1] that I
consider deprecated/deleteable. The builder, the old features/plugins which are now being
built in github upstream from us, and the patches I had to cobble together at some point
to allow us to fix stuff they were no longer fixing upstream in SVN -- that stuff is dead
to me.
So it should be removed, not moved into a directory.
But, since AFAIK we still plan to ship Drools 5.2.1.Final (or 5.3?)
in JBoss Tools 3.3.0 - SOA Tooling, and include it in the JBDS 5 - SOA Tooling site too (3
features) [2], I guess that means we need to keep the drools/docs/ [2] folder in our SVN
repo?
I've moved profiler and working set to github.
labs was after talking with Rob dead/unused code and thus I removed that.
That left DEPRECATED/drools which I've moved back to where it came from since the docs
area is still needed/used.
I haven't touched stuff stuff inside drools, so Nick please look at that and remove
what you stopped using (I assume that is everything except the docs folder ?)
/max
[1]
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/DEPRECATED/drools
[2]
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/DEPRECATED/drools/docs/
[3]
http://www.qa.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/builds/staging/devstudio-5.0_trunk....
Nick
On 11/27/2011 04:17 PM, Isaac Rooskov wrote:
> Hey Nick,
>
> we are the upstream for any tools documentation we currently ship. The
> only one there that has any docs I'd be concerned about is the Drools
> one; however if the feature is deprecated then we shouldn't be shipping
> docs for something we don't provide.
>
> So for JBDS 5, it won't be coming with anything relating to Drools? I
> know a Drools editor was removed in JBDS 4.1 due to no-one being able to
> maintain it, however I thought that was just the 'Rule Editor' and all
> other Drools components were still shipped (ie: DSL Editor and Flow
> Editor).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Isaac
>
> On 11/25/2011 08:28 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>> FYI, I've moved a few things out of the root and into a new child
>> folder called "DEPRECATED" because I'm fairly certain we don't
need
>> them any more (we don't build or publish them, or they've moved
>> upstream).
>>
>>
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/DEPRECATED/
>> > drools
>> > labs
>> > profiler
>> > workingset
>>
>> Note that the only piece of drools we still actively maintain is a bot
>> test [1]. All the rest of drools is entirely upstream.
>>
>> [1]
>>
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/build/aggregate/bottests-...
>>
>>
>> One thing I wasn't 100% sure about was the docs associated w/ these
>> projects, particularly drools. Isaac: do we own the docs [2], or are
>> they also upstream?
>>
>> [2]
>>
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/DEPRECATED/drools/docs/
>>
>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen