11:11 a.m.
Hi,
After talking yesterday with Seam/CDI/JSF team we came to the conclusion that
the fastest way we could get to Eclipse 3.7 is to break trunk for a while (i.e. the next 2
weeks).
Thus I've asked Nick to merge over the work he (and others) have been doing on the
Indigo branch
to trunk later today assuming there will be no objections to this mail.
Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7 development and
info on
when the merge is done.
I've created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8624 with links to migration docs
(not many right now)
and to link or subtask for any related Indigo issues.
Thanks,
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
8:20 a.m.
Branch is now building 3.2.1.CR1 / 4.1.0.CR1*, with TP pointing at
Eclipse 3.6 Helios (as before). Test failures:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8551 (jsf)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8552 (seam)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8581 (cdi)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8627 (cdi)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8628 (seam)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8636 (hibernate)
Trunk is now (not**) building 3.3.0.M1 / 5.0.0.M1, with TP pointing at
Eclipse 3.7 Indigo (my changes merged in from 3.3.helios branch).
Component changes have yet to be merged in - assuming component leads
&/or devs will do this. Test failures:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8032 (struts)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8404 (jsf)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8638 (jsf)
--
* - Upversioned from 4.0.1.
** - I've found and fixed a problem in the parent pom so this should be
working now. Once the TP/PP job [1] is done in about 90 mins, I can
verify my fix worked.
[1]
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.target-platfor...
Nick
On 03/29/2011 05:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Nick,
> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7
development and info on
> when the merge is done.
I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in the mail
stream.
What is the status of the merge ?
/max
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
12:28 p.m.
Nick,
Could you add m2e 0.13 update sites to the trunk/indigo TP:
m2e-core - http://download.eclipse.org/technology/m2e/updates/M
m2eclipse-wtp -
https://repository.sonatype.org/content/sites/forge-sites/m2eclipse-wtp/0...
(https://repository.sonatype.org/content/sites/forge-sites/m2eclipse-wtp/0...
is the latest)
Does the trunk TP contain Eclipse 3.7M6 or M5?
Thanks,
Snjeza
Nick Boldt wrote:
Branch is now building 3.2.1.CR1 / 4.1.0.CR1*, with TP pointing at
Eclipse 3.6 Helios (as before). Test failures:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8551 (jsf)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8552 (seam)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8581 (cdi)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8627 (cdi)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8628 (seam)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8636 (hibernate)
Trunk is now (not**) building 3.3.0.M1 / 5.0.0.M1, with TP pointing at
Eclipse 3.7 Indigo (my changes merged in from 3.3.helios branch).
Component changes have yet to be merged in - assuming component leads
&/or devs will do this. Test failures:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8032 (struts)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8404 (jsf)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8638 (jsf)
--
* - Upversioned from 4.0.1.
** - I've found and fixed a problem in the parent pom so this should be
working now. Once the TP/PP job [1] is done in about 90 mins, I can
verify my fix worked.
[1]
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.target-platfor...
Nick
On 03/29/2011 05:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Nick,
>
>
>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7
development and info on
>> when the merge is done.
>>
> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in the mail
stream.
>
> What is the status of the merge ?
>
> /max
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
5:29 p.m.
On 03/29/2011 10:28 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
Nick,
Could you add m2e 0.13 update sites to the trunk/indigo TP:
m2e-core - http://download.eclipse.org/technology/m2e/updates/M
m2eclipse-wtp -
https://repository.sonatype.org/content/sites/forge-sites/m2eclipse-wtp/0...
(https://repository.sonatype.org/content/sites/forge-sites/m2eclipse-wtp/0...
is the latest)
Does the trunk TP contain Eclipse 3.7M6 or M5?
Link to zipped target platform says
about M5.
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/target-platform_3.3.indigo/e...
Denis
Thanks,
Snjeza
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Branch is now building 3.2.1.CR1 / 4.1.0.CR1*, with TP pointing at
> Eclipse 3.6 Helios (as before). Test failures:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8551 (jsf)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8552 (seam)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8581 (cdi)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8627 (cdi)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8628 (seam)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8636 (hibernate)
>
> Trunk is now (not**) building 3.3.0.M1 / 5.0.0.M1, with TP pointing
> at Eclipse 3.7 Indigo (my changes merged in from 3.3.helios branch).
> Component changes have yet to be merged in - assuming component leads
> &/or devs will do this. Test failures:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8032 (struts)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8404 (jsf)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8638 (jsf)
>
> --
>
> * - Upversioned from 4.0.1.
>
> ** - I've found and fixed a problem in the parent pom so this should
> be working now. Once the TP/PP job [1] is done in about 90 mins, I
> can verify my fix worked.
>
> [1]
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.target-platfor...
>
> Nick
>
> On 03/29/2011 05:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Nick,
>>
>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
>>> Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>> when the merge is done.
>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in
>> the mail stream.
>>
>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
2:02 a.m.
It contains M5 for the moment. Do I need to bump up to M6? If so, fire
me a JIRA (or re-open / comment on an existing one assigned to me).
Re: m2eclipse 0.13, I've updated your last comment and assigned it to me
- will deal w/ it tomorrow:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8597?focusedCommentId=12588416&...
Thx,
On 03/29/2011 01:28 PM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
Nick,
Could you add m2e 0.13 update sites to the trunk/indigo TP:
m2e-core - http://download.eclipse.org/technology/m2e/updates/M
m2eclipse-wtp -
https://repository.sonatype.org/content/sites/forge-sites/m2eclipse-wtp/0...
(https://repository.sonatype.org/content/sites/forge-sites/m2eclipse-wtp/0...
is the latest)
Does the trunk TP contain Eclipse 3.7M6 or M5?
Thanks,
Snjeza
Nick Boldt wrote:
> Branch is now building 3.2.1.CR1 / 4.1.0.CR1*, with TP pointing at
> Eclipse 3.6 Helios (as before). Test failures:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8551 (jsf)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8552 (seam)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8581 (cdi)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8627 (cdi)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8628 (seam)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8636 (hibernate)
>
> Trunk is now (not**) building 3.3.0.M1 / 5.0.0.M1, with TP pointing at
> Eclipse 3.7 Indigo (my changes merged in from 3.3.helios branch).
> Component changes have yet to be merged in - assuming component leads
> &/or devs will do this. Test failures:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8032 (struts)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8404 (jsf)
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8638 (jsf)
>
> --
>
> * - Upversioned from 4.0.1.
>
> ** - I've found and fixed a problem in the parent pom so this should
> be working now. Once the TP/PP job [1] is done in about 90 mins, I can
> verify my fix worked.
>
> [1]
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.target-platfor...
>
>
> Nick
>
> On 03/29/2011 05:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Nick,
>>
>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
>>> Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>> when the merge is done.
>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in
>> the mail stream.
>>
>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
5:34 p.m.
On current target platform which is seems to be M5 there are compilation
errors in hibernate tools.
I've tried M6 and hibernate tools has even more problems. Because of
renaming plugins like:
jpt.core - > jpt.common.core
jpt.utility -> jpt.common.utility
jpt.db -> jpt.jpa.db
and e.t.c
Denis
On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Nick,
> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7
development and info on
> when the merge is done.
I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in the mail
stream.
What is the status of the merge ?
/max
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
4:49 a.m.
Yes,
as I said in my status mail there a a lot of changes in Dali jpa plugins.
ther plugins were not just renamed, but they were reorganized. API also
changed much.
The good news is that tomorrow I fixed all compile errors.
The bad one - hibernate jpa plugins will not work as expected. They
should fully be reviewed.
For sure NamigStrategy part should be fully reimplemented and
annotations probably will contain a lot of bugs.
Also I need to look at Seam-> hibernate usage. It seems to me there
should no be compile errors, but need to check.
I fixed the errors in M5, so also need to check new errors in M6.
Going to commit code without compile errors today.
Dmitry
30/03/2011 1:34, Denis Golovin wrote:
On current target platform which is seems to be M5 there are
compilation
errors in hibernate tools.
I've tried M6 and hibernate tools has even more problems. Because of
renaming plugins like:
jpt.core -> jpt.common.core
jpt.utility -> jpt.common.utility
jpt.db -> jpt.jpa.db
and e.t.c
Denis
On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Nick,
>
>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7
development and info on
>> when the merge is done.
> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in the mail
stream.
>
> What is the status of the merge ?
>
> /max
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
8:29 a.m.
Yes,
as I said in my status mail there a a lot of changes in Dali jpa plugins.
ther plugins were not just renamed, but they were reorganized. API also changed much.
Public API changed not just additons and changes to internals ? for real ?
The good news is that tomorrow I fixed all compile errors.
The bad one - hibernate jpa plugins will not work as expected. They should fully be
reviewed.
For sure NamigStrategy part should be fully reimplemented and annotations probably will
contain a lot of bugs.
Put it in jira and we'll just have to take them one by one.
Also I need to look at Seam-> hibernate usage. It seems to me there should no be
compile errors, but need to check.
I fixed the errors in M5, so also need to check new errors in M6.
Going to commit code without compile errors today.
Dmitry
30/03/2011 1:34, Denis Golovin wrote:
> On current target platform which is seems to be M5 there are compilation
> errors in hibernate tools.
>
> I've tried M6 and hibernate tools has even more problems. Because of
> renaming plugins like:
>
> jpt.core -> jpt.common.core
> jpt.utility -> jpt.common.utility
> jpt.db -> jpt.jpa.db
>
> and e.t.c
>
>
> Denis
>
>
>
> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Nick,
>>
>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7
development and info on
>>> when the merge is done.
>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in the
mail stream.
>>
>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
2:47 a.m.
I noticed tomorrow that my Eclipse lied to me.
It said there are no compilation errors but when I opened some java
files editor shown me many errors.
I added eclipse to trusted application in my fierwall and seems it now
works better :)
I've committed intermidiate fix, but compilation errors still exits.
Dmitry
30/03/2011 12:49, Dmitry Geraskov wrpte:
Yes,
as I said in my status mail there a a lot of changes in Dali jpa plugins.
ther plugins were not just renamed, but they were reorganized. API
also changed much.
The good news is that tomorrow I fixed all compile errors.
The bad one - hibernate jpa plugins will not work as expected. They
should fully be reviewed.
For sure NamigStrategy part should be fully reimplemented and
annotations probably will contain a lot of bugs.
Also I need to look at Seam-> hibernate usage. It seems to me there
should no be compile errors, but need to check.
I fixed the errors in M5, so also need to check new errors in M6.
Going to commit code without compile errors today.
Dmitry
30/03/2011 1:34, Denis Golovin wrote:
> On current target platform which is seems to be M5 there are compilation
> errors in hibernate tools.
>
> I've tried M6 and hibernate tools has even more problems. Because of
> renaming plugins like:
>
> jpt.core -> jpt.common.core
> jpt.utility -> jpt.common.utility
> jpt.db -> jpt.jpa.db
>
> and e.t.c
>
>
> Denis
>
>
>
> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Nick,
>>
>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
>>> Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>> when the merge is done.
>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in
>> the mail stream.
>>
>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
3:05 a.m.
It is compiled in eclipse, but it is not in maven. The reason is
Execution Environment in plugin'a MANIFEST.MF is J2SE-1.5. Compilation
fails for @Override annotation for implemented interface methods. After
switching to JavaSE-1.6 it should be good, but then it going to fail
because target platform is still Eclipse Indigo M5.
So we need to switch build to M6 ASAP.
Denis
On 03/31/2011 12:47 AM, Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
I noticed tomorrow that my Eclipse lied to me.
It said there are no compilation errors but when I opened some java
files editor shown me many errors.
I added eclipse to trusted application in my fierwall and seems it now
works better :)
I've committed intermidiate fix, but compilation errors still exits.
Dmitry
30/03/2011 12:49, Dmitry Geraskov wrpte:
> Yes,
> as I said in my status mail there a a lot of changes in Dali jpa
> plugins.
>
> ther plugins were not just renamed, but they were reorganized. API
> also changed much.
>
> The good news is that tomorrow I fixed all compile errors.
> The bad one - hibernate jpa plugins will not work as expected. They
> should fully be reviewed.
> For sure NamigStrategy part should be fully reimplemented and
> annotations probably will contain a lot of bugs.
>
> Also I need to look at Seam-> hibernate usage. It seems to me there
> should no be compile errors, but need to check.
>
> I fixed the errors in M5, so also need to check new errors in M6.
> Going to commit code without compile errors today.
>
> Dmitry
>
> 30/03/2011 1:34, Denis Golovin wrote:
>> On current target platform which is seems to be M5 there are
>> compilation
>> errors in hibernate tools.
>>
>> I've tried M6 and hibernate tools has even more problems. Because of
>> renaming plugins like:
>>
>> jpt.core -> jpt.common.core
>> jpt.utility -> jpt.common.utility
>> jpt.db -> jpt.jpa.db
>>
>> and e.t.c
>>
>>
>> Denis
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> Nick,
>>>
>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
>>>> Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>> when the merge is done.
>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet
>>> in the mail stream.
>>>
>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
2:07 p.m.
New subject: JBT/JBDS Target Platform now contains Indigo M6 bits (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
Target platforms now contain Indigo M6 bits.
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/target-platform_3.3.indigo/e...
http://reports.qa.atl.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/updates/jbds-target-platfor...
Had some trouble getting the JBDS TP to pull the correct versions of
IUs, but have solved that now too.
(Solution is to use my mvn/ant script in ~/trunk/build/target-platform
against an EMPTY repo dir, rather than working against previously-loaded
one, so that older versions aren't accidentally found; then the .target
file is regenerated w/ updated IU versions and can be committed so that
jobs are happy again.)
On 04/01/2011 04:05 AM, Denis Golovin wrote:
It is compiled in eclipse, but it is not in maven. The reason is
Execution Environment in plugin'a MANIFEST.MF is J2SE-1.5. Compilation
fails for @Override annotation for implemented interface methods. After
switching to JavaSE-1.6 it should be good, but then it going to fail
because target platform is still Eclipse Indigo M5.
So we need to switch build to M6 ASAP.
Denis
On 03/31/2011 12:47 AM, Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
> I noticed tomorrow that my Eclipse lied to me.
> It said there are no compilation errors but when I opened some java
> files editor shown me many errors.
> I added eclipse to trusted application in my fierwall and seems it now
> works better :)
>
> I've committed intermidiate fix, but compilation errors still exits.
>
> Dmitry
>
>
> 30/03/2011 12:49, Dmitry Geraskov wrpte:
>> Yes,
>> as I said in my status mail there a a lot of changes in Dali jpa
>> plugins.
>>
>> ther plugins were not just renamed, but they were reorganized. API
>> also changed much.
>>
>> The good news is that tomorrow I fixed all compile errors.
>> The bad one - hibernate jpa plugins will not work as expected. They
>> should fully be reviewed.
>> For sure NamigStrategy part should be fully reimplemented and
>> annotations probably will contain a lot of bugs.
>>
>> Also I need to look at Seam-> hibernate usage. It seems to me there
>> should no be compile errors, but need to check.
>>
>> I fixed the errors in M5, so also need to check new errors in M6.
>> Going to commit code without compile errors today.
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>> 30/03/2011 1:34, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>> On current target platform which is seems to be M5 there are
>>> compilation
>>> errors in hibernate tools.
>>>
>>> I've tried M6 and hibernate tools has even more problems. Because of
>>> renaming plugins like:
>>>
>>> jpt.core -> jpt.common.core
>>> jpt.utility -> jpt.common.utility
>>> jpt.db -> jpt.jpa.db
>>>
>>> and e.t.c
>>>
>>>
>>> Denis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> Nick,
>>>>
>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
>>>>> Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this
yet
>>>> in the mail stream.
>>>>
>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
3 a.m.
Yes - TPTP is dead.
/max
On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
Max,
TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says: "TPTP will
not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy component?
Denis
On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Nick,
>
>
>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7
development and info on
>> when the merge is done.
>>
>
> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in the mail
stream.
>
> What is the status of the merge ?
>
> /max
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
7:26 a.m.
We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
Snjeza
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Yes - TPTP is dead.
/max
On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
> Max,
>
> TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says: "TPTP
will not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy component?
>
> Denis
>
> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> Nick,
>>
>>
>>
>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse 3.7
development and info on
>>> when the merge is done.
>>>
>>>
>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in the
mail stream.
>>
>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
10:14 a.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't plan to
see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview, MAYBE,
but nothing more stable than that.
On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
Snjeza
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>
> /max
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>
>
>> Max,
>>
>> TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says:
"TPTP will not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy component?
>>
>> Denis
>>
>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Nick,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for Eclipse
3.7 development and info on
>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet in
the mail stream.
>>>
>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
11:07 a.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
it apparently is an existing project but since I haven't seen anything but this
proposal page
I got no clue what it actually can do.
Anyone got something more concrete ?
/max
On Mar 30, 2011, at 17:14, Nick Boldt wrote:
Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't
plan to
see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview, MAYBE,
but nothing more stable than that.
On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
> We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
>
> Snjeza
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>>
>> /max
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Max,
>>>
>>> TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says:
"TPTP will not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
>>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy component?
>>>
>>> Denis
>>>
>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nick,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this yet
in the mail stream.
>>>>
>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>
>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>
>>
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
11:40 a.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
Whatever gets decided, please put it in
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8495
so it's documented, tracked, and actionable w/ assignee.
Nick
On 03/30/2011 12:07 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
it apparently is an existing project but since I haven't seen
anything but this proposal page
I got no clue what it actually can do.
Anyone got something more concrete ?
/max
On Mar 30, 2011, at 17:14, Nick Boldt wrote:
> Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't plan to
> see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview, MAYBE,
> but nothing more stable than that.
>
>
> On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
>> We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
>>
>> Snjeza
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Max,
>>>>
>>>> TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says:
"TPTP will not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
>>>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy component?
>>>>
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nick,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this
yet in the mail stream.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>
>>>
>>> /max
>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
> --
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
12:03 p.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
well TPTP is gone/out/vanished.
Only complication is if it were exposed/included in JBDS 4 at some point ?
I don't believe it is ?
/max
On Mar 30, 2011, at 18:40, Nick Boldt wrote:
Whatever gets decided, please put it in
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8495
so it's documented, tracked, and actionable w/ assignee.
Nick
On 03/30/2011 12:07 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> it apparently is an existing project but since I haven't seen anything but this
proposal page
> I got no clue what it actually can do.
>
> Anyone got something more concrete ?
>
> /max
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 17:14, Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't plan to
>> see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview, MAYBE,
>> but nothing more stable than that.
>>
>>
>> On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
>>> We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
>>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
>>>
>>> Snjeza
>>>
>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Max,
>>>>>
>>>>> TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/
says: "TPTP will not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
>>>>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy
component?
>>>>>
>>>>> Denis
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits
for Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on
this yet in the mail stream.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
5:05 p.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
On 03/30/2011 10:03 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
well TPTP is gone/out/vanished.
Only complication is if it were exposed/included in JBDS 4 at some point ?
It was
in p2enabled JBDS in nightly builds until I vanished it.
I don't believe it is ?
It is not included in 4.0.0.GA for
sure, I've just checked it.
It means there should be no complications.
Denis
/max
On Mar 30, 2011, at 18:40, Nick Boldt wrote:
> Whatever gets decided, please put it in
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8495
>
> so it's documented, tracked, and actionable w/ assignee.
>
> Nick
>
> On 03/30/2011 12:07 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> it apparently is an existing project but since I haven't seen anything but
this proposal page
>> I got no clue what it actually can do.
>>
>> Anyone got something more concrete ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 17:14, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't plan
to
>>> see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview, MAYBE,
>>> but nothing more stable than that.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
>>>> We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
>>>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
>>>>
>>>> Snjeza
>>>>
>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Max,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/
says: "TPTP will not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
>>>>>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy
component?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nick,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper
bits for Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up
on this yet in the mail stream.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>> --
>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
4:20 a.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
> well TPTP is gone/out/vanished.
>
> Only complication is if it were exposed/included in JBDS 4 at some point ?
It was in p2enabled JBDS in nightly builds until I vanished it.
yeah, nightly builds is where we are allowed to foobar things once in a while ;)
> I don't believe it is ?
It is not included in 4.0.0.GA for sure, I've just checked it.
It means there should be no complications.
Thanks for confirming - and removing it from jbosstools shouldn't be a big deal.
Lets remove it early on and if there is an outcry we can look at options.
/max
Denis
> /max
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 18:40, Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Whatever gets decided, please put it in
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8495
>>
>> so it's documented, tracked, and actionable w/ assignee.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On 03/30/2011 12:07 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> it apparently is an existing project but since I haven't seen anything
but this proposal page
>>> I got no clue what it actually can do.
>>>
>>> Anyone got something more concrete ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 17:14, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't
plan to
>>>> see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview, MAYBE,
>>>> but nothing more stable than that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
>>>>> We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
>>>>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Snjeza
>>>>>
>>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Max,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TPTP project web site
http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says: "TPTP will not be in the Eclipse
Indigo release".
>>>>>>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy
component?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nick,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper
bits for Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a
follow up on this yet in the mail stream.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>> --
>>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>> /max
>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
11:41 a.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
Lets remove it early on and if there is an outcry we can look at
options.
/max
DONE: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8495
> Denis
>> /max
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 18:40, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>
>>> Whatever gets decided, please put it in
>>>
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8495
>>>
>>> so it's documented, tracked, and actionable w/ assignee.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> On 03/30/2011 12:07 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>> it apparently is an existing project but since I haven't seen
anything but this proposal page
>>>> I got no clue what it actually can do.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone got something more concrete ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 17:14, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't
plan to
>>>>> see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview,
MAYBE,
>>>>> but nothing more stable than that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
>>>>>> We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
>>>>>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is
available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Snjeza
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Max,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TPTP project web site
http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says: "TPTP will not be in the Eclipse
Indigo release".
>>>>>>>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to
legacy component?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nick,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the
proper bits for Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>>>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a
follow up on this yet in the mail stream.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>> --
>>>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>>>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>> /max
>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>> /max
>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
2:05 p.m.
New subject: Replacement options for TPTP (was Re: Moving Eclipse 3.7/Indigo onto trunk)
This project is Google's contribution and an adaptation of the CodePro
Profiler project.
More details about the project can be found here:
http://download.instantiations.com/ProfilerDoc/continuous/latest/docs/htm...
http://download.instantiations.com/ProfilerDoc/continuous/latest/docs/htm...
The project will be available in the first half of 2011. See
http://onpositive.com/OnPositive/Company/Solutions_for_people/profiler
Snjeza
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
it apparently is an existing project but since I haven't seen
anything but this proposal page
I got no clue what it actually can do.
Anyone got something more concrete ?
/max
On Mar 30, 2011, at 17:14, Nick Boldt wrote:
> Unless it's an existing project MOVING to Eclipse, I wouldn't plan to
> see any useful code in time for JBDS 5 this fall. Tech preview, MAYBE,
> but nothing more stable than that.
>
>
> On 03/30/2011 08:26 AM, Snjezana Peco wrote:
>
>> We could use Runtime Analysis Tools (RAT)
>> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/ when it is available.
>>
>> Snjeza
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Yes - TPTP is dead.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 24:53, Denis Golovin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Max,
>>>>
>>>> TPTP project web site http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/downloads/ says:
"TPTP will not be in the Eclipse Indigo release".
>>>> Should we archive our TPTP component and move it to legacy component?
>>>>
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>> On 03/29/2011 02:27 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nick,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick will send out info on how you can get the proper bits for
Eclipse 3.7 development and info on
>>>>>> when the merge is done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm coming out of my jetlag, haven't seen a follow up on this
yet in the mail stream.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the status of the merge ?
>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> /max
>>> http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
> --
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
5011
days inactive
5023
days old
jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
22 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Denis Golovin -
Dmitry Geraskov -
Max Rydahl Andersen -
Nick Boldt -
Snjezana Peco