Luckily Drools 5.2.x is also on codefreeze ;) We released Drools 5.2.0.CR1 last Friday, and final should be released end of this week. So I would recommend these as stable tags, preferring 5.2.0 final if that can still make it in, but the differences should be minimal.

Kris Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> I've just tested this with the Drools 5.2.CR1 release and snapshot and I cannot reproduce this. >> Do you know what version of Drools currently is integrated? >> > > The version you last told us to integrate with ? :) > > Looking at hudson it says we are picking up Drools 5.2-SNAPSHOT > which sounds very wrong considering we are in codefreeze since yesterday!!. > > Brian/Kris ? Which release should we be using for the upcoming release ? > > /max > > >> Kris >> >> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >>> Kris, >>> >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8820 >>> >>> Worked in previous versions - now it stopped. >>> >>> Is this something that is limited to a very specific use case or >>> something that is fixed so we don't have to keep this regression around ? >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> >>> >>> > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > > >