Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
Rob Stryker wrote:
> Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
>> Rob Stryker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You should take this into account when you parse code. User could
>>>>> close comment by unicode representation.
>>>>> Eclipse colouring doesn't take it into account.
>>>
>>> "Should" and "could" are two very different things. lol
>> Hm... I know... may be *can* instead of *could* is better, but it is
>> not your comment about.
>> I didn't understand it.
>>
>
> Sorry. What I meant was, we "can" take a user closing his comment by
> unicode into account, but I do not think we *should*. It sounds like
> a lot of work to do just to help someone who decided to close their
> comment with unicode.
>
Agree, while you should not worry about hackers and angry testers :)
I was an angry
tester today (no so crazy like in the discussion, but...
;) ) and I found some not obvious validator problems in seam wizards.
Them for example incorrectly validate method name (see New seam action
wizard).
Enter 'method1(){ String h="Hello, from Dima";} method2 ' and validator
will not show an error.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Geraskov
dgeraskov(a)exadel.com
Senior Developer
Exadel Inc