Test failing with Luna? Try the org.eclipse.osgi.compatibility.state fragment!
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Mickael Istria
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Hi all,
As part of Luna came a change that we've not correctly estimated: 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/Luna_Framework#Removal_of_the_PlatformAdm... 
. This cause some parts of Eclipse to be failing with surefire as they 
depend on a class which is not available in default Equinox bundles any 
more. The TEMPORARY workaround is to add a dependency to your 
tycho-surefire-plugin to fragment org.eclipse.osgi.compatibility.state.
So in case of failing test, try to add the fragment locally, and if it 
works better, open a bug to keep track of that change (make me a dep of 
JBIDE-16161). This should be fine for JBT 4.2.0.Alpha1 build and tests 
against Luna M3.
Then by Luna M4, this should happen: 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417429 , and hopefully, it 
will remove most of our dependencies on this somehow deprecated 
PlatfromAdmin service. We'll be able to get rid of the additional 
dependency on surefire, and everything will be fine.
In case you have a message in your tycho-surefire-plugin saying "Could 
not acquire PlatformAdmin", you can safely ignore it 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417429 . It's just a 
warning. What's important is whether your tests do work or not, and if 
not, whether adding the fragment helps.
-- 
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets 
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                11 years, 11 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        JBoss Central HTML5  archetype is borked
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Fred Bricon
                                    
                                
                                
                                        2 issues were introduced in JBoss Central with the latest stacks.yaml 
update :
- 2 archetype versions use the same html5-mobile tag :   2.4.0.Final and 
2.4.0-build-1. But JBT, using 
org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.ComparableVersion, finds 
2.4.0-build-1 is higher than 2.4.0.Final and uses it as the most recent 
version. Since 2.4.0-build-1 dependencies haven't been released as part 
of WFK 2.4, the generated project fails to build because of missing 
deps. lastWFKArchetypeRelease should be updated to 2.4.0.Final in 
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stack/blob/1.0.0.Final/stacks.yaml
- There's a blank html5 archetype, pointing at the non-blank one, which 
makes JBoss Central wizards to enable a useless 'use blank' checkbox. 
Why keep it referenced?
Fred
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                11 years, 11 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
            
        
        
        
            
        
        
        
            
        
        
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        ACTION REQUIRED: N&N for CR1/GA
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Michelle Murray
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Still outstanding N&N for CR1/GA. Action NOW. 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-15981 
Outstanding are: 
* BrowserSim 
* Visual Editor 
* Server 
Thanks, 
Michelle 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michelle Murray" <mmurray(a)redhat.com> 
To: "external-exadel-list list" <external-exadel-list(a)redhat.com> 
Cc: "jbds-pm-list" <jbds-pm-list(a)redhat.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, 20 November, 2013 10:47:39 AM 
Subject: ACTION REQUIRED: N&N for CR1/GA 
This is a reminder to complete any N&N for CR1/GA but the end of this week (Fri 22 Nov 2013). 
If you don't think you will make that deadline and need an extension, please contact Max and me. 
Thanks Andre for doing the OpenShift Tools N&N already. Much appreciated. :) 
Thanks, 
Michelle 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com> 
To: "jbosstools-dev jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org> 
Sent: Friday, 15 November, 2013 11:58:03 PM 
Subject: [jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: N&N for CR1/GA 
Hey, 
N&N main jira been created at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-15981 
I believe most would just be a reject/close since nothing changed but I know 
a few plugins added a few features to handled things based on QE and testing feedback. 
Michelle (doc) is requesting we get these in as quickly as possible so she can be aware 
of anything that can affect the last work on the docs. 
Thanks, 
Max 
_______________________________________________ 
jbosstools-dev mailing list 
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev 
_______________________________________________ 
jbosstools-dev mailing list 
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev 
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                11 years, 11 months