On 26. 3. 2014, at 18:56, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 26 Mar 2014, at 17:37, Len DiMaggio wrote:
> Why not provide both options?
which two options are you referring to ?
I think Len refers to this snippet from my email:
"So perhaps we should consider which one should be used for runtime detection in the
future. Or even better perhaps to offer both options for runtime detection?"
So once runtime detection finds the servers, you could choose which mode to use before
clicking OK to add them. But I’m not sure if there’s a way to do it and avoid confusion
for the user.
I think the idea about locking the servers deployment mode
is too strict in context runtime detection.
We need some way to change these - either allow same flexibility as
before or have a "Recreate this server using same basic info but in Profile X"
> -- Len
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com>
> | To: "Martin Malina" <mmalina(a)redhat.com>
> | Cc: "Rob Stryker" <rstryker(a)redhat.com>,
> | jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> | Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:32:36 AM
> | Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] New server profiles vs. Runtime Detection
> | I noticed this discrepancy too. Agree need to figure this workflow out.
> | /max (sent from my phone)
> | On 26/03/2014, at 12.03, Martin Malina < mmalina(a)redhat.com > wrote:
> | | Hi Rob,
> | | I have a question. Now that we have more profiles for servers ( JBIDE-16721
> | | )
> | | - one that prefers management operations and one that does not - what
> | | happens when you add a server using Runtime Detection? I think it will
> | | currently use the non-management option. In the past, you could change the
> | | server settings later to use management. But you say that increasingly
> | | there
> | | will be differences between the two that can’t be changed afterwards - one
> | | example is the deployment tab in the server editor.
> | | So perhaps we should consider which one should be used for runtime
> | | detection
> | | in the future. Or even better perhaps to offer both options for runtime
> | | detection?
> | | What do you think about this?
> | | Thanks,
> | | Martin
> | | --
> | | Martin Malina
> | | JBoss QA Engineer
> | | Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
> | | Purkynova 99
> | | 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
> | | Tel.: +420 532 294 265
> | | _______________________________________________
> | | jbosstools-dev mailing list
> | | jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> | | https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> | _______________________________________________
> | jbosstools-dev mailing list
> | jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> | https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> Len DiMaggio (ldimaggi(a)redhat.com)
> JBoss by Red Hat
> 314 Littleton Road
> Westford, MA 01886 USA
> tel: 978.392.3179
> cell: 781.472.9912
JBoss QA Engineer
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
Tel.: +420 532 294 265