On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:27 -0400, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> > I don't have the resources to promise that the
javaxpcom will
> work/be
> > maintained so i guess for now we will just continue to bundle the
> > eclipse/mozilla custom built one so any security issues is not
> exposed
> > in the general browser but only in the development tooling
> > where it is less of an issue since it is primarily used to access
> > local sites.
> >
> > /max
> What does this mean for question move VPE on xulrunner 1.9 or not?
> /Maksim Areshkau
That beyo8nd xulrunner 1.9 removing features we depend on we now also
need someone to maintain the xpcom interfaces...afaik ATF did that before.
Java
XPCOM bridge provided by mozilla, what doing ATF gays - just
provided a plugin with this interfaces, if so it's not difficult to do.
Who does it now ?
/max
Almost all xpcom interfaces that used by us has frozen status and
shouldn't changed, so this doesn't needed to change something.
--
Maksim Areshkau