Awesome. Saw this mail after my last response. Cool.
On 6 Oct 2016, at 12:19, Max Rydahl Andersen
> On 5 Oct 2016, at 19:03, Nick Boldt wrote:
> * There was also much discussion around the new Type A (only the
> license is checked) vs. Type B (old school full due diligence, with
> code provenance checked too) licensing. Decision was to only include
> type B stuff in release train for now, and wait for projects to
> complain they should be included, or perform more due diligence to be
> upgraded to Type B. Including Type A stuff opens a lot of trickle-down
> problems that no one wants to deal with unless we have to, such as
> "will end users still be allowed by their employer to use Eclipse, if
> there's no longer a guarantee of provenance check in the bundles?".
> More: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=501014
gah - thats annoying.
Do they even have a Type A project yet to exclude ?
Why not be open by default and handle it if there are issues ?