I always hated WTP's mixed cased and redundant foldernames.
e.g. EARContent, WebContent etc. but I guess following the "common"
standard is best to begin with.
But ESBContent is definitly one of those that needs user configurable
setting - just like wtp projects allows it.
META-INF is not user controllable since that is a folder that will be
copied directly based on the root of the content folder -
thus it needs to have that name; otherwise the deployment won't work.
/max
Hi all
About the ESB project structure, I have sent a ESB project structure
screen shot before,
As max suggestion, some folder should be user controlable, and some
certain folder such as "META-INF"
, do you guys have any thoughts or suggestions about it?
Thanks
Denny
--
-max