On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:32:57 +0100, Denis Golovin <dgolovin(a)exadel.com>
wrote:
Project should contains both files.
Antlr.jar - should be used during development.
Antlr-runtime.jar should be included into runtime classpath and excluded
from exported packages list
Does that sound right?
yes, except afaik Vitali included the generated source from the seam
project making the anltr.jar irrelevant.
-max
Denis
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:01:58 +0100, Vitali Yemialyanchyk
> <vyemialyanchyk(a)exadel.com> wrote:
>
>>> Ok - any idea why antlr-runtime.jar is not enough ?
>>
>> antlr-runtime.jar is code generator - we should use antlr.jar.
>
> This sounds wrong - normally antlr.jar is the code generator and
> antlr-runtime.jar
> is the one programs uses at runtime...
>
> /max
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
max(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen(a)jboss.com