On 18 Sep 2015, at 9:31, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 09/18/2015 08:56 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> The jetty stuff afaik is in best case not *dependent* by SR.1, but
> affected by it - but I wouldn't bet on it "just working".
I would bet that the Jetty part failed because of using Jetty 9.2.10
and 9.2.13 and facing the ClassNotFoundException on SpinLock detected
SR0 included jetty 9.2.9, but we used 9.2.10 so my guess is that using
9.2.13 will continue to work on SR0 too as long as we have the version
> We might have other being dependent on SR1 though, would be good
> what those are.
Several fixes depend on SR1. However, I don't know whether the version
range are strictly set to "install" the necessary SR1 part while
installing JBoss Tools.
Which fixes are that ? those are important to have identified.
Last years we linked such issues to the jira referring the update to
Mars SR1 to know this before hand.
> btw. the last years we built against SR0 but tested against
> Did we stop that ?
Seems like yes, we stopped that. I can't find any reason except that
we've forgotten to keep it in place, as the jetty issues somehow
forced us to be more careful with SR1 than with SR0.
so I suggest we bring that back if we can't find anything that
*actually* requires SR1.