Re[2]: [jbosstools-dev] Re: WTP 2.0.3 released...

> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:13:59 +0200, Denis Golovin > <dgolovin(a)exadel.com&gt; wrote: > >> Such as? >> Do you mean EAR deployment problems Rob fixed for last release? > > Yes, that is what the fixes in there is for. > >> Testing only specific low level technical bugs is not enough to >> confirm JBT 2.x works with WTP 2.0.3., general QA test cases should >> be also executed before we decide to release something. > > I don't want to release anything - that is the point. > I want to be able to tell/know if users should just use the latest WTP > instead of our patch. > > Very few things changed in WTP 2.0.3. > > -max > >> >> Denis. >> >> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> If QA has tests for this very specific low level technical bug then >>> sure. >>> >>> But I do not believe they have. >>> >>> -max >>> >>>> Max, >>>> >>>> I think to confirm that we have to pass it though QA. That means QA >>>> will install JBT 2.1.2 and WTP 2.0.3 and run at least smoke tests >>>> and tests related to deployment problems. >>>> >>>> Denis. >>>> >>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>>> Anyone confirmed wether WTP 2.0.3 will work with JBT 2.x ? >>>>> >>>>> /max >>>>> >>>>>> Will do, Max. the patch they used is exactly the same as the one >>>>>> I used and I was asked by David Williams if there were any other >>>>>> patches we included. I told him no and those should be ok. I'll >>>>>> try to test it ASAP but I'm diving deep into Marshall's head at >>>>>> the moment. >>>>>> >>>>>> I strongly believe it should be fine. I will test it anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>>>>> http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/releases/2.0.3/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems like important fixes of ours got in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rob, care to test/verify/comment that this one works as good as >>>>>>> the patch we currently require for JBoss Tools 2.1.x ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -max >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >