There is no reason for that, it just the same as it was from the
beginning. We have no naming conventions for case like this.
On 03/28/2010 11:27 AM, Andersen Max wrote:
Denis, any reason why we are using different named jars for
unpacked/packed jars ?
On Mar 26, 2010, at 19:40, Denis Golovin wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 07:24 AM, Jiri Peterka wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I have following problem with JBT plug-in dependencies and hope you
>> could help me. Simply I can't import
>> org.jboss.tools.common.editors.ObjectMultiPageEditor. This specific
>> issues is here since one of recent JBT (3.1) version.
>> There are simple steps to reproduce.
>> 1. Have JBDS 3.0.0 GA or JBT 3.1 installed
>> 2. Create plugin to test this problem
>> 3. Import org.jboss.common.model.ui on Dependencies tab
>> 4. In plug-in dependencies (Package Explorer)
>> org.jboss.tools.common.model.ui is missing and for example
>> ObjectMultiPageEditor (org.jboss.tool.common.editor) can't be imported
> It is here but name is model_ui.jar because it is deployed as unpacked.
> You cannot import
> because it requires org.eclipse.ui.ide.IGotoMarker and you have to add
org.eclipse.ui.ide plug-in to your plug-in dependencies because it is not reexported in
>> Strange is that plugin is here and I can see this plugin in Plug-in
>> registry, plugin can be added as dependency and it has exported packages
>> I needed but it's not present in Plug-In Dependencies (Package Explorer)
>> and can't be imported in the source code. In some earlier JBT 3.1 this
>> Any help appreciated, regards
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev mailing list