Re: [jbosstools-dev] Git - do it fully or not ?
+1 for git.
Work with svn is very slow and disk-consuming and I have still issues 'svn
up', it still needs cleanup, or refuses to update. I started to hate svn,
please unschackle me :-)
Btw. Nick and I had a chat the other day about what actually prevent us from moving and
if it was just a question about git vs svn then we could easily move (assuming windows
users
are fine with using bash/cygwin)
The challenge is that hudson+git is not as flexible as it currently is with svn and we
don't yet
have a good use of having our builds pick up latest/matching dependencies from a
repository -
thus not trivial to move away from git fully :(
Will require a lot of effort.
/max
Libor
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:54:34 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen
<max.andersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We got our svn mirror now but after working with it a bit its basically
> just as slow as normal svn (if you can get it to work).
>
> ...thus i'm wondering if anyone can come up with good reasons to *not*
> just move all new development over to git and simply kill off
> the SVN completely for our jbosstools trunk development ?
>
> 3.2.x would stay in SVN.
>
> Comments/Suggestions/Screams/Objections ?
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen