Didn't notice that.
I agree that antlr-runtime.jar should be enough than.
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:32:57 +0100, Denis Golovin
<dgolovin(a)exadel.com> wrote:
> Project should contains both files.
> Antlr.jar - should be used during development.
> Antlr-runtime.jar should be included into runtime classpath and
> excluded from exported packages list
>
> Does that sound right?
yes, except afaik Vitali included the generated source from the seam
project making the anltr.jar irrelevant.
-max
>
> Denis
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:01:58 +0100, Vitali Yemialyanchyk
>> <vyemialyanchyk(a)exadel.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Ok - any idea why antlr-runtime.jar is not enough ?
>>>
>>> antlr-runtime.jar is code generator - we should use antlr.jar.
>>
>> This sounds wrong - normally antlr.jar is the code generator and
>> antlr-runtime.jar
>> is the one programs uses at runtime...
>>
>> /max
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>