-1 to have hard dependencies to Mars.1
If user has Mars.1 then good. It will work fine.
If no, and still using Mars.0 then he/she should update if he wants to
have this bug fix.
IMO this is not critical enough to force users to use Mars.1
On 12/09/2015 10:25 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
We have in the past done updates to JBT / JBDS which *force* users to
move up to a SR1 or SR2 minimum but we've also done LOTS of releases
where it was optional.
So, yes, you need PM (Alexey) and QE (Len) to agree to this change. I
suspect Max will disagree to it.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Mickael Istria <mistria(a)redhat.com
<mailto:mistria@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 12/09/2015 03:56 PM, André Dietisheim wrote:
> I added org.eclipse.swt 3.104.1 as required plugins to
> openshift.ui and express.ui, shouldnt this trigger updated swt to
> get installed along JBT?
>
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-openshift/pull/838
People who're using Mars.0 and installing this OpenShift version
will see a remediation page that will force them to update their
whole IDE to Mars.1 (because SWT version is hardcoded in Platform,
and using newer SWT implies using newer Platform).
I don't know if this is something we want to enforce or not. I'm
personally OK with dictating users to use the newer/better
version, but you'll need other people to agree on that before
forcing such a change.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <
http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <
http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<
http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev